Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Sk 6Na hastiśuṇḍaṁ
Pāli / Sanskrit:Na hastiśuṇḍaṁ
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Na hastiśuṇḍaṁ Sutta: The Rule on the Elephant’s Trunk
Background
The Na hastiśuṇḍaṁ Sutta (Not an elephant’s trunk) is a text belonging to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. It is recorded in the Vibhaṅga, the detailed section explaining the precepts of the Sangha. This sutta concerns the conduct and characteristics of objects that may be owned or used in the monastic community.
The context in which this sutta appeared is connected with the development of the Sangha, the monastic community, during the time of the Buddha Śākyamuni. As the Sangha expanded, practical questions about owning property, using tools, and daily implements had to be clearly regulated. Therefore, the Buddha taught principles of discipline, not only concerning moral conduct but also the details of managing material things in the community.
Main Content
The Na hastiśuṇḍaṁ Sutta focuses on property related to objects or their features, especially items with shapes or functions similar to parts of animal bodies, in this case specifically an elephant’s trunk (hastiśuṇḍa). This sutta clearly states that things that are not actual elephant trunks, meaning trunks of living animals, but only artificial or simulated objects, may be used or possessed.
The pivotal point of the sutta lies in the distinction between what is “real” (satthu, owner or principal part) and what is “not real” or “artificial” (akataṁ). This is not a rudimentary requirement, but a mechanism for determining the lawful boundary of possession in the Sangha. When something only has the external form but not the substance, it is permitted, especially when its use is practical and does not violate the spirit of the teaching.
The sutta also reflects a principle of discernment in the Vinaya Piṭaka: useful objects are not rejected merely because of their shape or origin, provided they do not contradict the core spiritual precepts. This is a combination of clear independence (paññatti, regulation) and practicality.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.