Lzh Mu Bi Pm As 3Resolution Because of Past Insanity
Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūḷhavinaya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Amūḷhavinaya Discourse — Vinaya Piṭaka
Background
Amūḷhavinaya (Pāli: amūḷha = not deluded, vinaya = discipline) is a part of the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, where the rules that monks and nuns must follow are recorded. This discourse appears in the context of disputes about disciplinary treatment in the Saṅgha, especially in relation to cases where a monastic had previously committed a fault but, because of an unstable mental state, that action was not considered a full violation.
The Buddha taught that three factors determine the nature of an action (kamma): intention (cetanā), clear understanding (sampajañña), and the state of mind (citta). When a person acts in a state of delusion (moha), including mental disturbance, insanity, or lack of full awareness, the nature and degree of the violation differ from an action done intentionally and with awareness.
Main Content
The Amūḷhavinaya discourse handles the situation in which a monastic has committed some fault, such as a breach of the precepts or improper conduct, but later, when the mind has returned to normal and they clearly recognize that action, they need to make a resolution (adhiṭṭhāna) or undertake correction (paṭikariya).
The key point is the distinction between what occurs when the mind is deluded and what occurs when the mind is aware. If a monastic commits a fault while mentally unstable, such as insane, dreaming, or affected by substances that influence the mind, the Saṅgha may consider those conditions when deciding on a penalty or disciplinary treatment.
However, after the mind has recovered, that monastic must actively acknowledge the mistake, correct the action, and commit not to repeat it. The subsequent “non-delusion” (amūḷha) becomes very important: this is when they fully recognize the importance of the Vinaya and their responsibility within the Saṅgha community.
Practical Meaning
In practice, this discourse reminds us that lucid awareness (sammā-sampajañña) is the foundation of ethical conduct.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.