Lzh Sarv Bu Vb As 3Resolution Because of Past Insanity
Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūḷhavinaya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of the Amūḷhavinaya Discourse
Context
The Amūḷhavinaya discourse (the disciplinary resolution for one who is no longer deluded) belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda tradition of the Buddha Dharma. This is one of the rules related to handling issues that arise in the Sangha community when disputes or violations of discipline occur.
The context in which this discourse appeared is connected with actual situations in monasteries during the Buddha's lifetime. Some monastics, because of past mental confusion or temporary mental illness, performed actions not in accordance with the discipline. When they recovered clarity, the community needed a fair way to handle the situation, not punishing those who unintentionally violated the rule because their mind was not clear.
This discourse reflects the wisdom and compassion of the Buddha in establishing discipline. Severe punishment is not always applied; circumstances and the mental condition of the offender must be considered.
Main Content
The specific content of this discourse has not yet been fully translated in the present materials. However, according to the general context of the Theravāda Vinaya Pitaka, the Amūḷhavinaya discourse addresses the principle of exemption from responsibility and resolution of disputes (samavāya) when members of the Sangha violate rules because the mind is not clear.
The core principle is this: if a monk or bhikkhunī performs an inappropriate action while mentally confused and not aware of their conduct, that action is not considered an intentional offense. Buddhist jurists recognize that intentional violation (sañcetanā) is the most important factor in determining the degree of fault.
The procedure for handling such cases usually involves the Sangha making a clear decision (ñatti, motion or resolution) to recognize the condition of incomplete consciousness of the person concerned, thereby exempting or reducing the penalty. This is one of the four methods of resolving disputes (samavāya) recognized by the Buddha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.