Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bi Sk 64Breaking Lumps

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kabaḷāvacchedaka

📖764 words · ~3 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Breaking Lumps of Rice — Kabaḷāvacchedaka

Xct Mu Bi Sk 64 | Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

---

Source Status

The original text of this Vinaya item, numbered Xct Mu Bi Sk 64, belonging to the Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan within the tradition of Comparative Sectarian Canons, does not currently have a full text directly collated in the accessible data repository. Therefore, this explanation is not a translation of the original Vinaya text, but a general presentation based on the descriptive information provided, including the tradition, the Vietnamese title (Breaking Lumps of Rice), the English title (Breaking Lumps), and the Pāli term Kabaḷāvacchedaka. All analysis below remains within the limits of what can be identified from those elements and does not infer further details beyond the scope of the descriptive information.

---

Context

This Vinaya entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan materials, that is, a section comparing the disciplinary content of different Buddhist schools. This type of material is especially valuable for the historical study of the Vinaya, because it allows one to see similarities and differences among traditions, from Theravāda, Mūlasarvāstivāda, Dharmaguptaka, to other schools, in how the conduct of bhikkhus is regulated.

The marker Mu Bi Sk in the numbering suggests that this item belongs to the system of rules associated with the Mūlasarvāstivāda tradition, the Bi subsection, likely indicating bhikkhu or bhikṣu, and the Sk group, commonly used for training rules of deportment and etiquette (Śaikṣā-dharma, corresponding to Sekhiya in the Pāli tradition). This is the group of rules that regulates small gestures and behaviors in the daily life of one gone forth, especially in situations related to eating, walking, standing, and contact with laypeople.

---

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

The term Kabaḷāvacchedaka, composed of two parts, kabaḷa (a mouthful or lump of food) and avacchedaka (breaking, cutting off, separating), indicates the act of breaking or separating a lump of food while eating. In the system of training rules concerning eating deportment among the schools, this is a rule governing how a bhikkhu receives and handles food in the bowl, so that the act of eating is carried out with composure, mindfulness, and without causing distress to donors or fellow practitioners who witness it.

According to the tradition of training rules on deportment, the act of breaking a lump of rice or a rice ball before putting it into the mouth, such as crumbling food in the bowl or separating a rice ball into small pieces before eating in a careless way, may be considered untidy, lacking in deportment, or wasteful. This training rule therefore guides the bhikkhu to preserve proper conduct in eating, reflecting the spirit of fewness of wishes, contentment, and gratitude for offerings.

Because this is Tibetan comparative material, the specific content of this rule in the Mūlasarvāstivāda system may have both similarities and differences compared with the Pāli or Chinese traditions, but the detailed full text has not been directly collated in this case.

---

Meaning for Practice

Though it is a rule of deportment that may appear small, Kabaḷāvacchedaka carries deep significance for practice in the life of the Sangha. The eating of one gone forth is not merely a physiological need, but also an expression of the inner mind, the degree of mindfulness, patience, and gratitude toward offerings.

When a bhikkhu eats with full mindfulness, every action, from holding the bowl, taking the food, to bringing it to the mouth, becomes practice. Conversely, a careless act such as arbitrarily breaking food may reflect a scattered mind, lack of attention, or lack of respect for the offerings sincerely given by faithful donors.

In the context of comparative sectarian study, the fact that many traditions preserve similar training rules shows that attention to deportment in eating is a shared value that crosses sectarian boundaries, expressing the fundamental spirit of the holy life: every gesture is an opportunity to nourish awareness.

For students of Buddhism and practitioners today, this training rule reminds us that the path of liberation is not separate from the smallest ordinary moments, even the moment of holding a bowl of rice in one’s hand.

---

Comparative Note

Because the original full text of Xct Mu Bi Sk 64 has not been directly collated in the current data repository, researchers who wish to understand it more deeply should consult Tibetan Vinaya editions related to the Mūlasarvāstivāda tradition, as well as contemporary Buddhist scholarly works comparing disciplinary rules across schools, in order to verify the specific content, style, and points of agreement and difference among traditions.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.