Mpt As 5Further Penalty

Further Penalty — Tassapāpiyasikā

Mpt As 5 | Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit | Sectarian Scriptural Tradition · Comparative

---

Source Status

The full source text of this item, belonging to the Sanskrit-form Comparative Vinaya and marked Mpt As 5, has not yet been directly compared with an accessible original. What can be presented below is built entirely on the descriptive information provided, including the collection name, item number, Vietnamese title, English title, and the Pāli term Tassapāpiyasikā. Therefore, this explanation is not a translation of the original scripture, does not reproduce the Buddha’s words according to specific chapters or divisions, and does not name translators or comparative sources not confirmed by the descriptive information. All analysis is general and scholarly in nature, intended to help readers orient themselves properly toward the term and its related context.

---

Background

The term Tassapāpiyasikā (sometimes transcribed as Tassapāpiyasikā kamma) is one type of formal act (kamma) recorded in the legal system of early Buddhist discipline. Etymologically, it derives from tassa (“of that person”) and pāpiyasikā (“worse, more evil, pertaining to an aggravated wrongdoing”), and may be understood as “the act determining a more serious offense for that person” or “the procedure for imposing a further penalty.”

The Sanskrit Comparative Vinaya, to which Mpt As 5 belongs, is a form of comparative legal text that places side by side disciplinary regulations from various Buddhist schools through Sanskrit or Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. It is a valuable source for studying divergence and convergence in Vinaya traditions among schools such as the Dharmaguptaka, Mūlasarvāstivāda, Mahāsāṃghika, Sarvāstivāda, and related traditions. The designation “Mpt” in the item number may suggest that it belongs to a classification group concerning formal procedures (āpatti-adhikaraṇa) or collective acts of the Sangha (saṅghakamma), but this is only a scholarly inference from the naming structure and is not confirmed by the descriptive information.

---

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

Based on the title “Further Penalty” and the term Tassapāpiyasikā, the content of this item most likely relates to a special formal procedure that the Sangha applies to a bhikkhu who has committed an offense but then behaves dishonestly, denies it, or gives a false statement when questioned by the Sangha.

In Buddhist jurisprudence, Tassapāpiyasikā kamma is commonly described as a collective act of the Sangha intended to “increase the seriousness” of the offense for one who is dishonest during the process of self-disclosure or confession. This is not simply an additional punishment in an additive sense, but has legal meaning: the Sangha formally establishes that the person’s conduct is worse than what was initially considered, because of concealment, lying, or non-cooperation in the adjudication process.

This reflects a foundational principle in Buddhist discipline: honesty and self-knowledge are not merely personal qualities but the basis by which the Sangha maintains purity and harmony. One who breaks a precept but confesses honestly is handled according to a different, gentler, and more restorative procedure; by contrast, one who conceals or speaks falsely faces an aggravated formal act such as Tassapāpiyasikā.

---

Meaning for Practice

From the perspective of practice, the term and the concept behind Tassapāpiyasikā open several important lessons:

First, honesty within the community of practice is not optional, but an essential condition for the Sangha to function in accordance with the Dharma. Concealing a fault does not make the fault disappear; on the contrary, it creates further karma through the act of dishonesty.

Second, the Buddhist Vinaya is not a system of punishment in the worldly sense, but a system of education and restoration. The presence of a procedure such as Tassapāpiyasikā shows that the Sangha has a legal and moral responsibility to determine clearly the nature of each act, not to punish more severely for the sake of authority, but to establish the truth transparently.

Third, in the context of sectarian comparison, the appearance of an equivalent procedure in many different traditions, even if the name or form of practice differs, shows that the principle of honesty in internal adjudication is a universal value widely shared throughout the history of Buddhist jurisprudence.

For students and practitioners today, studying formal procedures such as this helps one understand more deeply the disciplinary structure of the Sangha and why the Buddha established each provision of the Vinaya in such detail and with such system.

---

Comparative Note

Because the full original Sanskrit text of Mpt As 5 has not yet been directly compared within the scope of this explanation, all statements regarding specific content, textual structure, or original wording remain unconfirmed. Researchers who wish to investigate this topic more deeply should consult directly the original Sanskrit Vinaya texts of the relevant school, as well as specialized scholarly works on comparative Buddhist jurisprudence, in order to gain a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the term Tassapāpiyasikā in this specific textual context.