Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Sk 33Na veṣṭitaśiraso pravekṣyāma
Pāli / Sanskrit:Na veṣṭitaśiraso pravekṣyāma
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This item has descriptive information recorded as Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Sk 33, belonging to the Chinese Comparative Vinaya, with Vietnamese title, English title, and Pali title all given as “Na veṣṭitaśiraso pravekṣyāma.” The data does not provide a Vietnamese translation of the title, the full Chinese text, a comparative translation, or any note on context. Therefore, this explanation is based only on the item code, the Sk group, the title phrase provided, and the truncated end of the Vietnamese text.
The old ending explained that this rule concerns not covering the head when entering a sacred space or a place of activity for monks and nuns, seeing the uncovered head as an expression of humility and of not concealing the mind. These ideas may accord with the general meaning of the phrase “veṣṭitaśiraso,” which usually suggests a head that is wrapped or covered, but they are not confirmed by the original source. Therefore, one should not firmly assert that the rule speaks of shrines, places of worship, or a specific type of space if the descriptive information does not state this.
Context
In the Vinaya, the deportment of a renunciant is regulated with great subtlety. The way one wears robes, bares a shoulder, covers the body, carries the bowl, enters a house, sits, eats, teaches the Dharma, or appears before the community all has educational meaning. These rules are not only meant to create a uniform form, but also help practitioners live with mindful bodily karma. When the body is restrained, the mind is less scattered; outward humility supports inward humility.
The title phrase “Na veṣṭitaśiraso pravekṣyāma” may be understood as a training rule about not entering somewhere with the head wrapped or covered. Since no official translation is present in the data, the understanding must be kept cautious. Nevertheless, from the perspective of deportment, covering the head when entering a space requiring respect could have been considered undignified or inconsistent with the renunciant style of that time.
The old ending emphasized the image of the uncovered head as a symbol of renouncing delusion. This is a symbolic interpretation and should not be treated as the original content. Even so, it suggests a point for practice: a renunciant should not use clothing or appearance to create an arrogant distance, concealment, or a worldly manner.
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
From the descriptive information, it can be determined that this is Sk rule 33 in the Chinese comparative Vinaya. The Sk group suggests that this is a rule about deportment, not necessarily a grave offense, but a standard to be learned and practiced. The phrase “Na … pravekṣyāma” has a negative form and a verb meaning “we shall enter” or “we shall go in” in the style of a training rule; “veṣṭitaśiraso” suggests the state of the head being wrapped, bound, or covered. However, this is only an analysis based on the title supplied in the descriptive information, not a comparison with the original text.
What can be safely interpreted is this: the practitioner is reminded not to enter some space with the head covered or wrapped in an inappropriate manner. What that space is, whether a layperson’s house, a place of worship, an eating area, a lecture hall, or another domain, requires confirmation from the full text. Nor can one determine the type of cloth, cap, wrapping, or exceptional circumstances such as illness, cold, sun, or local custom.
The old ending’s phrase “not concealing the mind” is a way of developing a doctrinal meaning from the form of deportment. This idea may be retained as a practical symbol, but a clear distinction must be made between symbolism and content determined from the text.
Meaning for Practice
This training reminds a practitioner that dignity is not ornamentation, but uprightness of body and mind. When entering a space connected with the Sangha, lay followers, or the holy life, the renunciant’s body should express respect. A tightly wrapped head, if considered inappropriate according to the convention of the time, might create a sense of distance, pride, or lack of openness before the assembly.
On the inner level, “not covering the head” may be read as a reminder not to cover oneself with a false appearance. A practitioner does not need to seem special, does not need to borrow clothing to create authority, and should not let outward form conceal the truth within. When the body enters a place requiring respect, the mind should also enter with humility, mindfulness, and without display.
Still, symbolic interpretation must be accompanied by sobriety. Vinaya study is not only spiritual allegory; it is also a concrete norm in a particular cultural context. If there are reasons of health, climate, safety, or custom, the full Vinaya text may contain distinctions that the present data does not reveal. Therefore, one should not turn this into a rigid judgment against every form of wearing a hat or covering the head in every era. What is more important is to examine the state of mind: Is one covering for a valid need, or as an expression of pride, heedlessness, or lack of respect?
Comparative Notes
The source should be compared in order to determine the exact training sentence, the space being referred to, the subject to whom it applies, and any exceptions. It is also worth checking what corresponding Chinese title exists, and why the current Vietnamese title remains in Sanskrit/Pāli form instead of being translated by meaning. If editing for general readers, one may need to add a cautious Vietnamese title such as “Do Not Enter with the Head Wrapped or Covered,” but only after textual comparison.
This explanation does not confirm a place, person, chapter, translator’s name, or specific teaching beyond the data. The ideas about humility, not concealing the mind, and respecting the space of practice are doctrinal interpretations based on the old ending and the deportmental character of the Sk group, not a translation of the original text. When the full text is available, symbolic points that exceed the meaning of the text must be corrected.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.