Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pc 29Giving Food to Ascetics
Pāli / Sanskrit:Acelaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Acelaka Discourse - Offering Rice to Solitary Ascetics
Background
The Acelaka discourse (Pāli: “solitary person,” “those with independent aims”) belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon and outlines regulations concerning the giving of rice gruel to solitary ascetic practitioners, those who practice outside the official Sangha. In the context of Theravāda Buddhism, the Vinaya is not only a disciplinary code but also a profound sociological document, recording the way of life and interactions between the Sangha and the lay Buddhist community.
This discourse arose from practical questions: Should a Buddhist or layperson offer rice to solitary ascetics? If so, according to what principles? These issues are not meaningless theory, but relate directly to the definition of a religious community, trust, and wholesome intention in the Buddha’s Dharma.
Main Content
The Acelaka discourse states that providing rice gruel or food to solitary ascetic practitioners is a worthy and permissible act, provided there is clarity regarding their purpose in practice. However, the donor must verify that the recipient is truly practicing according to the true Dharma, and is not merely someone claiming to be a renunciant while in fact seeking to exploit or deceive.
The Vinaya Piṭaka emphasizes that offering support (yogi dāna) is a noble form of giving, but it must be “mindful giving,” that is, giving without greed, hatred, or delusion concealed behind it. If someone offers rice in the hope of receiving praise, reputation, or some other selfish satisfaction, that merit is diminished.
The discourse also indicates that not everyone who wears the clothing of a renunciant is worthy of receiving offerings. Those who violate the Buddha’s path, or who do not practice according to the Five Precepts (Pañcasīla), should not be supported, not as a punishment, but because the donor should not become one who supports unwholesome actions. This differs from unconditional compassion; it is practical wisdom, knowing how to give wisely.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.