Lzh Dg Bi Pm Pc 58Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Discourse on Criticizing Robe Distribution (Dubbala)
Background
This discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the basic rules binding bhikkhus within the Buddhist Sangha. The appearance of the Dubbala discourse reflects practical problems that arose in the monastic community concerning the distribution of robes, one of the essential requisites for the life of monastics.
According to the Theravāda tradition, these rules were established to maintain discipline, harmony, and spiritual progress within the Sangha. Whenever Buddhists observed improper conduct, the Buddha would set forth a rule to prevent it. The Dubbala discourse concerns criticizing or condemning the way robes are distributed among members, a matter that can give rise to jealousy, resentment, and division in the Sangha body.
Main Content
This discourse centers on the point that bhikkhus should not criticize decisions or procedures related to the distribution of robes to fellow practitioners. Criticism here is not reasonable, mature comment intended to improve matters, but disrespectful, harsh, or personally motivated fault-finding.
The basic reason for this rule is to protect unity and mutual respect within the Sangha. Robes, though material objects, are directly connected to life and health, and can arouse negative emotions such as jealousy (issā) or greed (lobha) if they are not distributed fairly and accepted harmoniously.
When a bhikkhu criticizes or complains about the distribution of robes, whether about who received better robes, who was disadvantaged, or the decisions of elders, this act is regarded as a violation of the Pātimokkha. It not only expresses lack of confidence in the fairness of the Sangha body, but also damages common trust and creates negative factions.
Practical Meaning
Beneath this disciplinary rule lies a profound lesson about the attitude of practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.