Upp Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of the Dubbala Discourse (Upp Pc 9)
Criticism Concerning the Distribution of Robes
Background
The Dubbala discourse belongs to the Ubhato Patikamma, the twofold offenses, in the Theravāda Vinaya tradition, reflecting disputes that arose in the monastic community soon after the time of the Buddha. The context of the Vinaya Piṭaka is the ethical standard (sīla) established by the Blessed Buddha to maintain harmony in the Sangha and protect the integrity of practice.
During this period, monastics lived mainly by alms and by receiving gifts from laypeople, including robes. Yet the way these gifts were distributed sometimes caused dissatisfaction, jealousy, and disputes. This discourse addresses the problem of weak monks (dubbala, from "dub," weak, unstable) in observing the principle of fair distribution, or those who criticize the distribution made by other monastics.
Main Content
The Dubbala discourse deals with the situation in which a monk criticizes the community's manner of distributing robes. This is not legitimate criticism based on the Vinaya, but personal dissatisfaction or inward greed. The issue raised is: when is criticism well-founded, and when is it a violation?
According to the Vinaya, if a monastic continually complains about the community's distribution without a valid reason based on the Discipline, or if his motive is greed, hatred, or personal desire, he has violated the principle of practice. Specifically, this belongs to the minor rules (Pācittiya) or other Pātimokkha rules.
The discourse emphasizes that monastics of weak standing (dubbala) are those who are not firm in faith or are not sufficiently clear about the Discipline. They may easily be stirred by resentful or greedy thoughts, leading to speech that causes disharmony. The Vinaya warns that such conduct violates harmony (samaggi), a central value in the Buddhist monastic community.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.