Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Vb Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala

📖285 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Discourse Criticizing the Distribution of Robes

Dubbala — Theravāda Vinaya Piṭaka

Background

This discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, the section containing rules and instructions concerning discipline in the Sangha. Specifically, it belongs to the Pātimokkha, the table of precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), the prohibitions that bhikkhus must observe.

The historical background of this discourse relates to the management of shared property in the community of practice. During the Buddha’s time, the Sangha held in common such property as robes and training implements. Fair distribution was an important matter, because it affected the harmony and sincerity of the whole Sangha. Some bhikkhus acted by criticizing or speaking harshly about the way robes were distributed, causing disputes and internal division. The Buddha therefore established a rule to prevent the act of speaking critically (dubbala) about this matter.

Main Content

This rule prohibits bhikkhus from speaking critically or reproachfully about the way the Sangha distributes robes and other requisites of practice. The act of “speaking critically” (dubbala) here is not merely private conversation, but the public act of rejecting, complaining, or stirring up dissatisfaction in the community.

The reason for this rule is very clear: if members of the Sangha were allowed freely to criticize the decisions of the group managing property, usually led by senior bhikkhus, this would lead to:

First, loss of trust in the fairness and transparency of the Sangha. Second, the arising of disputes and internal division, weakening collective strength. Third, distraction of the members’ minds from the primary work of practice.

A bhikkhu who violates this rule must admit the fault (patidesaniya) before the Sangha. The consequence is not expulsion from the Sangha, but requires public acknowledgment and correction.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.