Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala

📖293 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

THE SUTTA ON CRITICIZING DISTRIBUTION OF ROBE GOODS (Dubbala)

Background

This sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Early Buddhist tradition, recorded among the rules governing the life of the monastic community. In the early period of Buddhism, as the Sangha developed, the issue of distributing requisites for practice, especially robes (cīvara), became a matter that had to be managed wisely.

The background of Dubbala arose when there were disputes or dissatisfaction concerning the way robe goods were distributed in the community. Some monks or nuns might feel they were treated unfairly, or the leading monastics might be accused of abusing their authority to distribute goods unfairly. This sutta concerns monks and nuns criticizing or complaining about the manner of distribution, also called speaking ill or raising objections.

This is not a debate about fairness or unfairness in the modern sense, but a matter of discipline and governance in the monastic community, where contempt or public criticism may disrupt harmony (samaggī), one of the most important values in the Sangha.

Main Content

Dubbala deals with the situation in which monks or nuns criticize or complain about the way robes are distributed, or criticize those who manage the distribution. Public criticism (sambhinda-vaco) concerning internal matters of the Sangha, especially matters related to the support and welfare of the community, is regarded as a disciplinary violation.

In the Patimokkha, the list of offenses, publicly criticizing the decisions of the community or of leaders without legitimate reason, or undermining trust in the community, is regarded as a Pachittiya (pāṭidesanīya), an offense requiring public repentance. This does not mean that monks and nuns are not allowed to raise views or bring up real issues, but the manner and motivation must be carefully considered.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.