Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Dubbala Sutta
Criticism of the Distribution of Robes
Background
The Dubbala Sutta (Pāli: Dubbala, meaning “weak” or “unstable”) is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the early Buddhist tradition. This work belongs to the category of rules for the Sangha, the community of bhikkhus, concerning the management of communal property, especially robes (cīvara).
The historical background of the discourse records situations arising from the Bamboo Grove (Veḷuvana) at Rājagaha, where Buddha Śākyamuni often resided. Some bhikkhus criticized the manner in which robes were distributed, saying it was unfair or unclear, leading to disputes and loss of harmony in the Sangha. This dissatisfaction violated the spirit of communal practice: harmony, self-restraint, and simplicity.
Seeing this situation, the Buddha laid down detailed regulations to clarify the principles of fair, transparent, and orderly distribution. This discourse therefore became a foundation for conduct in Buddhist communities down to the present day.
Main Content
The Dubbala Sutta centers on the issue of bhikkhus criticizing other bhikkhus or respected teachers because of the way they distribute robes. Such criticism arises from partiality, jealousy, or misunderstanding of the distribution process. Public criticism harms personal honor, breaks mutual respect, and weakens the moral foundation of the Sangha.
The Buddha clearly indicated that bhikkhus authorized to distribute robes must follow specific principles: fairness, equality, and no personal favoritism. If there is dissatisfaction, bhikkhus should discuss the matter privately or present it directly to those concerned, rather than publicly criticizing in a way that causes disorder.
The discourse also states that distribution must be transparent, and bhikkhus must be clearly informed of the criteria for selection. If genuine injustice is discovered, the matter must be resolved through the proper mechanism of the Sangha, not by criticism or careless speech.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.