Lzh Mi Bu Pm Pc 80Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Dubbala Discourse: Explanation of Criticizing the Distribution of Robes
Background
The Dubbala discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the table of disciplinary rules. It is one of the teachings on discipline in the Sangha, the community of bhikkhus, focusing on the issue of abuse, criticism, or improper conduct in the distribution of robes, one of the four essential requisites of Buddhist monastics.
The background for the arising of this discourse lies in the early stages of the Sangha’s development, when the Buddha’s disciples began to form rules for living together. Robes are not only clothing protecting the body, but also a symbol of renunciation of material possession and commitment to Buddhism. Therefore, the use and distribution of robes became an important ethical matter.
Main Content
The Dubbala discourse addresses situations in which a bhikkhu may criticize or mock other bhikkhus about the way they distribute or use robes. This may include criticizing someone for receiving many robes, criticizing how someone uses communal property, or even exploiting this issue to pick quarrels with fellow practitioners.
The discourse teaches that such criticism outwardly "crushes" or weakens (dubbala, weak, collapsed) the spirit of harmony in the Sangha. Criticism that is improper, without compassionate intention, or driven by anger, partiality, or envy, creates conflict and disintegration. This violates the basic principle of the Sangha: unity, harmony, and mutual support (saṅgaha-vatthu).
In particular, if the criticism is untrue or spoken publicly to shame another person, this becomes a serious fault in the discipline of the Sangha. Even when criticism has a basis, it must be spoken privately, with the sincere intention to help, not to indulge oneself or cause disorder.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.