Lzh Dg Bi Pm Np 12An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ūnapañcabandhana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Ūnapañcabandhana Scripture
An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends
Background
This scripture belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, specifically the Pātimokkha--the basic prohibitions for monastics. The Vinaya Piṭaka is not a set of profound spiritual doctrines but specific rules of living that help the monastic community maintain self-discipline and harmony.
The issue in the Ūnapañcabandhana scripture concerns the use and maintenance of the bowl (patta), the almsbowl of deeply practicing monastics. The almsbowl is one of the four essential requisites for a monk: robes, a bowl for alms, lodging, and medicine. For many reasons--daily use, wear over time, or impact--an almsbowl may easily become damaged, cracked, or have broken places that need to be mended in order to continue being used.
This scripture handles a specific legal question: When is an almsbowl still considered usable? What is the boundary of permitting the use of a damaged bowl? And in particular, how many mends may a bowl have while still being considered valid?
Main Content
The title "Ūnapañcabandhana" (fewer than five mends) clearly indicates the content of the rule. According to the traditional Vinaya, an almsbowl is permitted for use as long as the number of mends does not exceed five (or is fewer than five). This is a specific number established by the Buddha or the elders, reflecting a balance between the practical realities of life and simplicity in practice.
If a bowl exceeds five mends, this may indicate that it is too old, too worn, or no longer safe to use--therefore it needs to be discarded or replaced. This regulation has an educational function: it teaches monastics that although they should not pursue luxury, they should also not try to keep requisites that are no longer reasonable or no longer clean.
This reflects a deeper principle in the Vinaya: the middle way (majjhimā paṭipadā).
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.