Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Np 12An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ūnapañcabandhana

📖312 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the “Almsbowl with Fewer Than Five Mends” Discourse (Ūnapañcabandhana)

Background

This discourse belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the basic code governing the life of bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs. In the Theravāda tradition, the Vinaya Piṭaka is regarded as the foundation of the Sangha, the community of practice, helping protect both the material and spiritual life of those gone forth.

The almsbowl (pātra) is one of the most essential implements of a Buddhist practitioner. It is not only a tool for holding water or eating rice, but also a symbol of simplicity, refinement, and purity in daily life. Regulations concerning the almsbowl reflect the Buddhist philosophy of using property with clear comprehension (sampajañña).

This discourse concerns a specific situation: an almsbowl with fewer than five mends. The “mends” (bandhana) here refer to places repaired in order to maintain the integrity of the bowl. This is an important practical decision concerning whether a bhikkhu may use such an almsbowl.

Main Content

According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, an almsbowl is considered suitable for use when it does not exceed a certain limit in the number of repairs. If an almsbowl has more than five mends (pañcabandhana), it is considered no longer suitable for use and should be discarded.

The case in this discourse, an almsbowl with fewer than five mends (ūnapañcabandhana), belongs to the category of items that may still be used. This shows the practicality and wisdom of the Buddha-Dharma: not every damaged item must be thrown away immediately, but there should be reasonable consideration of usability and legal limits.

This decision does not arise from greed or laziness, but from the principle of “chinesophia” (the wisdom of the middle way), finding the path between indulgence in pleasure and extreme asceticism. A practitioner should know how to care for entrusted property without becoming enslaved to it.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.