Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Np 12An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends

An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends

Ūnapañcabandhana
Comparative Vinaya — Chinese · Sarvāstivāda · Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Np 12

---

Source Status

The original text of this training rule belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese, in the Nissaggiya Pācittiya section for bhikkhunīs, according to the Sarvāstivāda sectarian tradition. This is a training rule in the system of discipline transmitted and recorded in Chinese; it does not belong to the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition.

The full original Chinese text of this training rule has not yet been directly collated and entered into the system for specific citation. Therefore, the interpretation below is built entirely from the provided descriptive information, including the Vietnamese title, English title, and the Sanskrit/Pāli term Ūnapañcabandhana, together with general contextual understanding of the related type of training rule. Readers should note that this is a general AI interpretation, not an authoritative canonical translation.

---

Background

In the disciplinary systems of the Buddhist schools, the group Nissaggiya Pācittiya (forfeiture and confession, meaning an offense that requires relinquishing the offending object and confessing before the Sangha) includes training rules concerning the improper acceptance, use, or keeping of personal requisites. This group of rules is lighter than Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa, but still requires the practitioner to deal with the offending object and undertake confession solemnly.

This training rule Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Np 12 belongs to the rules for bhikkhunīs (Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga), that is, the rules for women who have gone forth and received full ordination in the Sarvāstivāda tradition. The rules for bhikkhunīs often contain more training rules than those for bhikkhus, reflecting the Vinaya's concern for the particular circumstances in the life of practice of women renunciants.

Ūnapañcabandhana is a compound made of two components: ūna (lacking, insufficient, fewer than) and pañcabandhana (five mends, five bindings). The whole term may be understood as "not yet having five mends" — that is, a bowl (pātra/patta) that has not yet been mended the prescribed number of times before one is allowed to ask for or receive a new bowl.

---

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

Based on the title and the term, this training rule concerns the almsbowl, one of the most essential and sacred requisites in the life of a renunciant in the alms-round tradition. The core content revolves around the principle: a bhikkhunī is not permitted to receive or keep an additional new bowl when her present bowl has not yet been broken or damaged to the point of having been mended five times.

The criterion of "five mends" (pañcabandhana) is the specific threshold the Vinaya uses to determine when a bowl is "old enough" or "damaged enough" to make it reasonable to request a new bowl. If the present bowl has not yet reached this threshold, that is, if the number of mends is still ūna (fewer than five), then receiving a new bowl is an offense under this Nissaggiya Pācittiya training rule.

When a violation occurs, the offending object (the newly received bowl improperly accepted) must be forfeited before the Sangha or before a group of bhikkhunīs, after which the offender undertakes confession according to the prescribed ritual. The bowl may thereafter be returned to her for use, depending on the specific regulations of each school.

---

Meaning for Study and Practice

This training rule has deep and practical meaning for study and practice in several respects:

First, the spirit of fewness of wishes and contentment. The bowl is a symbol of the alms-round life, of reliance on pure offerings from the lay community. The rule not to seek a new bowl while the old one has not truly deteriorated reflects a basic Buddhist principle: the renunciant should not accumulate, should not demand, and must know how to cherish what has been received.

Second, guarding against subtle greed. Wanting a newer, more beautiful, more convenient bowl while the old bowl is still usable is a manifestation of subtle greed, the kind of greed that hides beneath needs that appear legitimate. The Vinaya sets a specific criterion (five mends) in order to prevent the thought, "My bowl is already old; it needs to be replaced," when in fact replacement is not yet necessary.

Third, protecting the pure offerings of the Sangha and the community. A bowl is a valuable offering. If renunciants easily request new bowls, this creates a burden for donors and may lead to abuse of the faithful generosity of laypeople.

Fourth, consistency among the schools. Similar training rules concerning the almsbowl and the criterion of "five mends" also appear in the Vinayas of many different schools, showing that this is an early rule widely accepted in the history of the Buddhist Sangha.

---

Comparative Note

This is an AI interpretation built from the descriptive information of the Inti Dharma system, not a translation from the original Chinese text. The full Chinese text of the training rule Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Np 12 in the Comparative Vinaya of the Sarvāstivāda tradition has not been directly collated within the scope of this interpretation. Serious researchers of Vinaya studies or of comparison among the schools should consult the corresponding Chinese text directly and specialized studies on the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya for a firmer scholarly basis.