Xct Mu Bi Pm Np 14An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ūnapañcabandhana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Sutta on an Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends (Ūnapañcabandhana)
Background
The Ūnapañcabandhana Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of Theravāda Buddhism and is one of the detailed regulations concerning the implements of practice used by monks and nuns. The Vinaya Piṭaka records the rules laid down by the Buddha to maintain discipline in the Sangha, helping monastics focus on morality (sīla) and spiritual cultivation.
This sutta specifically discusses the almsbowl, an indispensable implement for a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī on the alms round. The almsbowl symbolizes the simplicity and non-accumulation of a practitioner of the Buddha’s path. Yet the bowl is also an object used daily, easily damaged and in need of repair. The sutta defines standards for repairing the almsbowl so that it still fulfills its function and does not violate the spirit of practice.
Main Content
According to the regulation in the Vinaya Pitaka, an almsbowl is considered valid for use when it has five or more mends (pañcabandhana). Conversely, an almsbowl with fewer than five mends (ūnapañcabandhana) is considered not yet sufficient by this standard and must be further repaired or replaced.
This rule is not unreasonable. A bowl with too few mends means it is still too new or has not been used for long. This relates to the theory of ownership in Theravāda Buddhism: monastics are not to accumulate additional goods without cause, especially brand-new or luxurious items. An almsbowl has value only if it is a practical implement used over a long period, not a symbol of wealth or ego.
According to Buddhist history, this rule also reflects the psychology of the practitioner: one who has gone forth has abandoned extravagant needs, and therefore a bowl with many mends, long used, is especially suited to the spirit of taking the Dharma seriously and making light of possessions. The almsbowl is regarded as an implement of practice, not personal property for boasting.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.