Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Pm Sk 32Nāprativekṣyāsanaṁ niṣatsyāma

Pāli / Sanskrit:Nāprativekṣyāsanaṁ niṣatsyāma

📖289 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of the Nāprativekṣyāsanaṁ Niṣatsyāma Discourse

Context

This discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, the collection prescribing the ethics and discipline of the Theravāda Buddhist Sangha. The Vinaya Piṭaka is not merely a collection of prohibitions, but a system of practice intended to train the mind, protect harmony within the religious community, and guide disciples toward liberation.

The title “Nāprativekṣyāsanaṁ niṣatsyāma” means “We shall not sit in judgment without careful examination” or “We shall not make a decision without full consideration.” This is a basic principle concerning how the Sangha handles disciplinary matters and internal disputes.

The context in which this discourse arose concerns situations in which monastics needed to gather to resolve violations or disputes according to the principle of Pañcaṅga-pārisuddhi, the fivefold purity. This discourse emphasizes that a decision or judgment is valid only when all necessary conditions are fully met.

Main Content

The main principle in the discourse is that no collective decision of the Sangha may be made without following strict standards. Specifically, monastics may not judge someone to have violated the discipline without carefully examining such factors as the presence of reliable witnesses, the admission of the accused, or other clear evidence.

The discourse emphasizes that the process of investigation and judgment must take place within the Sangha, the monastic community with a sufficient quorum. No individual may decide on their own to punish another. Every decision must be the result of collective deliberation, in which each member has the opportunity to speak and vote.

Furthermore, this discourse implicitly indicates that the purpose of judgment is not punishment for revenge, but the protection of the integrity of the Sangha, the education of the offender, and the maintenance of common discipline.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.