Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 17Encroaching on a Monastic
Pāli / Sanskrit:Anupakhajja
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
THE ANUPAKHAJJA RULE: ENCROACHING ON MONASTERY LAND
Background
The Anupakhajja rule is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha Saṃvara, the training provisions related to the collective discipline of bhikkhus. This rule reflects practical legal issues that arose in the early Buddhist monastic community, when monks needed to protect the common property and land of monasteries.
In the context of Theravāda Buddhism, the Sangha, the community of monastics, is regarded as a legal collective with the right to hold public property: plots of land and buildings for study and practice offered by wise laypeople for the service of the monks. Therefore, encroaching upon or unlawfully occupying such property is not only a violation of ownership but also an improper act within the Sangha.
Main Content
The Anupakhajja rule concerns the act of “encroaching little by little” (anupakhajja) upon land or property belonging to monastery grounds. Specifically, this is the case in which a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī takes advantage of neglect or lack of cultivation to gradually expand the area under his or her own control, or occupies part of the Sangha’s land for personal purposes without lawful permission.
This rule is built upon a clear principle: property belonging to the Sangha must be used in common for the entire community or according to a collective decision of the monks. The act of appropriating little by little not only violates the trust of the community, but also creates disorder in the management of property, harming the harmony and purity of the monastic body.
This provision may apply to such situations as expanding a personal garden beyond the permitted boundary, using public land for unauthorized construction, or gradually taking advantage of portions of land considered to be unmanaged. Even acts that seem “minor” are called into question because they violate the principles of transparency and shared responsibility within the community.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.