Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Sarv Bu Pm Tf 11 Sk 71Breaking Lumps

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kabaḷāvacchedaka

📖935 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This item has been restored from descriptive information and the truncated ending of the Vietnamese text, not from a fully collated canonical Vinaya text. The available data include the item number San Sarv Bu Pm Tf 11 Sk 71, the tradition Sectarian Canons · Comparative, the collection Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit, the Vietnamese title “Bẻ Vụn,” the English title “Breaking Lumps,” and the Pali title “Kabaḷāvacchedaka.” The ending shows that the previous interpretation was discussing the division of rice portions, fairness, avoidance of disputes, and preservation of harmony in the Sangha. However, because the full source text is not present in the data, the context for the rule, the original wording, or the specific case that gave rise to the rule cannot be fully determined.

Context

This item belongs to the Vinaya group, so its nearest context is monastic life and training rules concerning daily deportment. The titles “Bẻ Vụn” and “Breaking Lumps” suggest an action involving food, perhaps a lump of rice or a portion of food being divided during a meal. In the Vinaya tradition, such rules usually do not concern only external politeness. They also train the mind in contentment, respect for offered food, and harmonious living with the community.

The truncated ending connected this with fair sharing of rice, without favoritism and without reliance on status or personal relationships. Although it cannot yet be asserted that this is the direct content of the rule, this interpretive direction still has value for practice in a general sense: in the Sangha, even a morsel of food can become a place where greed, comparison, dissatisfaction, or humility is expressed. Therefore, the Vinaya carefully attends to the deportment of eating not because of mere form, but because it touches the foundation of the life of renunciation.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

It can be determined that this item relates to a training rule named Kabaḷāvacchedaka, rendered or interpreted by the system as “Bẻ Vụn” and “Breaking Lumps.” From these titles, one can say that the topic is connected with breaking, separating, cutting, or detaching a portion of food into smaller pieces. But one cannot say with certainty that this action is prohibited in all cases, in what situation it is regulated, or what specific food item is meant, if relying only on the descriptive information.

The ending of the old version emphasized the danger of small disputes in the sharing of rice portions. This allows one to recognize the style of the previous Vietnamese text: using a very concrete act of eating to develop ethical and communal meaning. Even so, one must avoid saying that the Buddha cited exactly such a dispute, or used exactly the words in this interpretation, because the data does not provide the original. What can be presented more securely is this: the item belongs to the domain of training in deportment, moderation, fairness, and care when receiving food.

In the Vinaya, food is not simply food. For monastics, it is a condition sustaining life, offered by faithful donors, used to maintain this body for practice. When encountering food with a mind of attachment, preference, grasping for a portion, or careless handling, a practitioner can diminish the quality of contentment. Therefore, even breaking a lump of rice or handling a mass of food can become an object of mindfulness.

Meaning for Practice

The outstanding lesson from this item is that practice begins in small actions. Students of the path often easily think that practice takes place only in meditation, chanting, teaching, or major decisions. But the Vinaya reminds us that the way one holds the bowl, receives food, shares portions, eats, and behaves during a meal are all environments for practice. Wherever there is choosing and reacting in the mind, there is an opportunity to see greed, hatred, and delusion clearly.

If understood in the direction of sharing food portions, this training rule points to fairness and harmony. A community of practice cannot endure if its members accumulate dissatisfaction from small matters. An unequal portion, a gesture of favoritism, or an insensitive action may give rise to comparison and division. Conversely, when the community practices uprightness and contentment in every morsel, mutual confidence is protected.

For the individual, “breaking lumps” may also be seen as a symbol for dividing desire into smaller pieces in order to observe it. Greed often does not appear through great declarations, but through wanting a little more, choosing a slightly better portion, or being displeased because one’s own portion is a little smaller. Recognizing these small movements is the beginning of wakefulness. Practitioners do not disregard details, because details are where habitual tendencies most clearly appear.

For laypeople, this meaning remains close to daily life. Family meals, the division of property, treatment within a group, and the use of common goods all require fairness, contentment, and respect. When mindfulness is practiced in everyday activities, students of Buddhism bring the Dharma out of the realm of theory and make the path live within life itself.

Collation Note

The source text has not been collated in the data. The full text needs to be checked in order to determine exactly what conduct “Kabaḷāvacchedaka” refers to, the degree of the rule, and whether it is directly related to dividing rice or only to handling food during a meal. This version does not assert any specific character, event, chapter, or verbatim teaching beyond the descriptive information. It is a restored AI interpretation intended to preserve a dignified and cautious style, not to replace a translation of the original Vinaya.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.