Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Np 14A New Blanket Should be Kept for Six Years
Pāli / Sanskrit:Chabbassa
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This item has descriptive information including the code “Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Np 14,” the tradition “Sectarian Canon · Comparative,” the Chinese Comparative Vinaya collection, the Vietnamese title “Chăn Mới Phải Giữ Sáu Năm,” the English title “A New Blanket Should be Kept for Six Years,” the Pali title “Chabbassa,” and a source link. The old Vietnamese text was truncated immediately after an empty heading, but the remaining ending spoke of the six-year period, not replacing something new too soon, the spirit of making full use of things, non-wastefulness, and respect for the value of requisites. The data does not provide the full source text, the establishment context, or the original rule sentence.
Therefore, the text below is an AI interpretation based on the descriptive information and the truncated ending. It is not possible to affirm the precise conditions of exception, the specific kind of blanket, how the period is counted, or the form of handling in case of violation. This should not be understood as a translation of the original canonical Vinaya text. What can be determined is that this item relates to keeping a new blanket for a period of six years, thereby educating the attitude of moderation, contentment, and non-wastefulness.
Context
In the life of one gone forth, requisites are not possessions to be accumulated or changed according to preference. They are means for protecting the body, maintaining health, and helping practitioners have conditions to cultivate the path. When something is still usable but one already wants to replace it, craving may hide beneath reasons that appear very reasonable: wanting something better, lighter, more beautiful, more convenient, or more fitting. Thus vinaya attends to the whole cycle of using requisites, not only to the receiving of them.
The title “A New Blanket Should be Kept for Six Years” shows that the main content concerns the minimum period of use for a new blanket. The old ending explained that the number six years should not be seen as arbitrary, but as reflecting the practical fact that a good-quality requisite, if carefully maintained, can be used for a long time. That passage also says that replacing it too soon without a proper reason may express selfishness, greed, or lack of respect for what has been offered.
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
It can be determined that this item belongs to the Chinese Comparative Vinaya, bears the code “Np 14,” and has a title that directly states a rule concerning a new blanket and a six-year period. The Pali name “Chabbassa” also suggests the six-year element, but the data does not provide the full grammatical context, so no deeper interpretation is needed. The remaining ending shows that the old interpretation emphasized durability, care, avoiding discarding the old for the new, and learning to cherish property.
It may be cautiously stated that one gone forth is advised not to treat requisites as consumer goods to be replaced at will. Once a new blanket has been obtained, it should be used and cared for within a prescribed period, unless the full source text states exceptions that the present data does not provide. Such a rule helps prevent misuse of the generosity of lay supporters, while reducing the tendency to want new objects merely because of personal preference.
It cannot be determined from the descriptive information what material the blanket is made of, whether the rule applies to every kind of blanket or only one kind, or whether there are cases of damage, illness, climate, or permission from the Sangha. Nor can the manner of confession, relinquishment, or handling of the object be affirmed. The safe understanding is to regard this training rule as a discipline of thrift, responsibility, and stability in using requisites.
Meaning for Practice
The meaning for practice in this item is very clear: contentment is not only not demanding much, but also knowing how to use things for a long time, use them carefully, and use them with gratitude. An offered object carries with it the effort of those who made it, those who preserved it, and those who gave rise to faith and presented it. If the recipient uses it carelessly, quickly tires of it, or seeks to replace it when there is no need, then that receiving lacks the depth of gratitude.
The six-year period in the title also has an educational meaning for the mind. It compels practitioners to face the tendency to want constant renewal. When one must live with an object for a long time, one learns to preserve it, repair it, accept its becoming old, and not let natural wear give rise to dissatisfaction. This is a practice contrary to the consumer mind: not running after the new, not regarding comfort as a reward, and not allowing material things to govern one’s sense of sufficiency.
For laypeople, this lesson too is worth contemplating. Modern society encourages rapid replacement, making wastefulness a habit that is hard to recognize. To learn from this spirit does not necessarily mean keeping every object for exactly six years in all circumstances, but rather asking before replacing something: is the old object still usable, is this need real, am I seeking usefulness or nourishing a feeling of lack? When that question is raised, consumption becomes a place for practicing wakefulness.
Comparative Note
There is not yet a full source text to check the rule “Chabbassa” in the Chinese recension or related recensions. One should not add exceptions, procedures, materials, penalties, or establishment contexts beyond the descriptive information. This interpretation is based only on the title “A New Blanket Should be Kept for Six Years” and the truncated ending, which speaks of not replacing things too soon, not wasting, and respecting the value of requisites.
When comparison becomes possible, it will be necessary to check precisely how the six-year period is applied, what conditions allow replacement, and how the original text handles the case of a damaged blanket. Until such comparison is available, this item should be read as a reminder of moderation, gratitude for requisites offered, and the ability to live simply without being led by the desire for the new.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.