Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Sk 66Breaking Lumps

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kabaḷāvacchedaka

📖990 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This item is an AI interpretation based on the descriptive information included in the data: identifying code lzh-sarv-bu-pm-2-sk66, item number Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Sk 66, belonging to the comparative Sectarian Canon, the Chinese Comparative Vinaya collection, with the Vietnamese title “Bẻ Vụn Cơm,” English title “Breaking Lumps,” and Pali title “Kabaḷāvacchedaka.” The previous Vietnamese text was truncated after a passage about the meaning of practice, so the remainder cannot be treated as complete or verified.

There is no complete source text in the data for collation. Therefore, the details of the rule, the circumstances in which the training rule arose, the persons involved, or the specific wording in the Chinese text cannot be affirmed. The truncated ending mentions equality, non-self, and communal life, but shows signs of being a broader interpretation than the title. The text below will maintain caution: it relies only on the title and what can be inferred from the truncated content, without turning inference into scripture.

Context

In the training rules concerning deportment while taking food, small gestures such as holding the bowl, taking food, putting rice into the mouth, chewing, swallowing, or handling a mouthful are all placed under the light of mindfulness. The purpose is not to create lifeless severity in form, but to help the practitioner see bodily action and mental action clearly in every activity. While eating, the mind of craving taste, haste, disrespect, or heedlessness can appear very easily. Therefore, Vinaya rules often use concrete regulations to bring the mind back to wakefulness.

The title “Bẻ Vụn Cơm” suggests the action of separating lumps of rice or food. If understood in terms of deportment, the issue may lie in the manner of breaking, crumbling, or handling food so that it is not coarse or undignified. In the monastic tradition, eating and drinking are not entirely private actions; they occur in relation to the assembly, donors, and the ideal of the holy life. A careless movement can diminish the dignified appearance of one who keeps discipline.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the English title “Breaking Lumps” and the Pali “Kabaḷāvacchedaka,” it can be determined that the training rule concerns breaking or dividing lumps of food, most likely rice or food formed into portions. The Vietnamese title “Bẻ Vụn Cơm” supports this understanding. However, the descriptive information does not say clearly whether the rule prohibits breaking in a certain way, breaking too finely, or only regulates the manner so that it accords with deportment. Therefore, every detailed interpretation must be treated as provisional.

The previous truncated ending speaks at length about equality in receiving one’s portion and refusing conditional privileges. These ideas may belong to a broader interpretive thread about eating in the Sangha, but it cannot be affirmed that they are the direct focus of the item “Bẻ Vụn Cơm” without seeing the complete text. What is more certain is this: the item belongs to a group of small regulations concerning the manner of eating, and thereby reminds the practitioner not to be lax in bodily conduct while taking food.

If interpreted according to the spirit of Vinaya study, breaking lumps of rice can become a problem when it expresses coarseness, greed for food, lack of mindfulness, or makes the food disorderly. The renunciant is trained to relate to food with simplicity: knowing enough, using it for its proper purpose, not putting on airs, not becoming fastidious, and also not being careless. This balance is the point to preserve.

Meaning for Practice

The lesson of practice here does not lie in the grain of rice as an object, but in the mind when handling that grain of rice. A person may eat very simple food while the mind is still full of craving; another may eat in conditions of sufficiency while still preserving wakefulness, gratitude, and non-attachment. The training rule concerning the way of breaking rice reminds us that mindfulness is not found only in the meditation hall. It must be present in the hands, the eyes, the rhythm of eating, and the degree of attention to those around us.

When the practitioner breaks food carefully, moderately, without displaying impatience, that person is training a dignified body and a dignified mind. A dignified body helps the assembly be at ease; a dignified mind makes it harder for unwholesome dharmas to increase. A small gesture repeated every day becomes a quality of character. If that gesture goes together with craving, it nourishes a habit of craving. If it goes together with mindfulness, it nourishes self-restraint.

For Buddhist practitioners today, this item may be understood as a reminder about the culture of consumption. We often think practice is related only to large ideas, but many afflictions begin from very small reactions: wanting faster, more, better tasting, more convenient. When we know how to stop within an act of eating, we are learning to see desire clearly before it becomes speech or action that causes harm.

Collation Note

The complete text at the source given in the data needs to be collated in order to determine precisely the conduct being regulated: at what stage rice is broken, to what degree, in what circumstance, and with what corresponding Chinese terminology. It is also necessary to check whether the old interpretive passage about equality in distribution truly belongs to this item or is a thread mixed in from another training rule about receiving food.

The present text does not add persons, circumstances of rule formation, canonical location, chapters, sections, translators, or sources of comparison beyond the data. It gives only a cautious interpretation: from the act of breaking lumps of rice, the practitioner is reminded of mindfulness in taking food, the dignity of bodily conduct, and an attitude free from craving toward food. When the original text is available, any part that exceeds the scope of the training rule needs to be corrected.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.