Lzh Mu Bi Vb Pc 22Eating More After Refusing an Invitation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Pavāraṇā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Pavāraṇā Sutta: Eating More After Refusing an Invitation
Background
Pavāraṇā is a disciplinary rule (Pātimokkha) belonging to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. This rule is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pācittiya section, offenses requiring confession. Pavāraṇā refers to a situation involving refusal of an invitation to eat, followed by eating more, an act that violates principles of moderation and goodwill in the Buddhist Sangha.
In the context of the Vinaya, these rules were established to protect the purity of the Sangha and help bhikkhus avoid actions that could cause misunderstanding, discord, or loss of faith among lay Buddhists. Pācittiya offenses often concern actions that are not root unwholesome deeds, but may diminish the purity of the life of practice.
Main Content
According to the Pavāraṇā Pācittiya, when a bhikkhu is invited to eat a meal by a layperson and he refuses that invitation, saying that he does not need or does not wish to eat for some reason, but afterwards goes and eats more elsewhere or with someone else, this is considered a violation. Such an action is regarded as dishonest or lacking goodwill toward the person who invited him.
This Pācittiya offense arises from the intention to mislead or from lack of respect. When a bhikkhu refuses an invitation, he indirectly tells the layperson that he does not need or does not wish to eat; eating more afterwards indicates that he has lied or been insincere. This not only violates the ideal of truthfulness (sacca), but may also harm the faith of laypeople.
The Vinaya emphasizes that the Sangha must maintain noble and trustworthy ethics. Refusing an invitation and then eating more is a contradictory action, causing loss of dignity and possibly making others feel unfairly treated. Therefore, rules such as Pavāraṇā were established to protect sincere relationships between the Sangha and laypeople.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.