Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Kd 3Eating More After Refusing an Invitation

Pāli / Sanskrit:Pavāraṇā

📖296 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of the Pavāraṇā Scripture

On Eating More After Refusing an Invitation

Context

The Pavāraṇā scripture (Pāli: Pavāraṇā, meaning “invitation”) is deeply related to one of the most important practice periods in Theravāda Buddhism: the Vassa retreat, the three-month rains period during which bhikkhus observe strict restrictions on travel. At the end of Vassa is the Pavāraṇā rite, that is, the invitation for admonition, when each bhikkhu publicly “invites” others to point out faults he may have committed during the season of practice.

This scripture records a disciplinary situation related to eating after refusing an invitation. This is not a common case, but it reflects the Theravāda understanding of the importance of decision and speech, as well as the way disciplinary violations are handled in the Sangha.

Main Content

According to the Pāli Vinaya tradition, this scripture concerns a bhikkhu who refuses an invitation to eat a meal (or refuses to attend a meal), but afterward eats more or eats again without proper permission. This action is regarded as a form of dishonesty, violating the principle of the pātimokkha (the basic rules of discipline).

The issue raised is not simply eating, drinking, or refusal, but inconsistency between speech and action, a violation of the basic ethical foundations of the Sangha. When a bhikkhu refuses an invitation, it is understood as a clear statement of his intention. Later violating that statement is regarded as a lack of truthfulness (musāvāda), one of the basic precepts that every bhikkhu must observe.

The Sangha’s handling of such cases usually has three steps: first, discovering the violation; second, informing the offender; and third, applying an appropriate penalty according to the pātimokkha, which may be a communal penalty or a requirement of public confession before the whole Sangha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.