Bi As 33. Resolution Because of Past Insanity
Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūḷhavinaya
A nun who is insane is not responsible for her own offenses. Any offenses she may have committed while insane can be cleared through a declaration of past insanity.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Amūḷhavinaya Sutta: Resolution of Offenses Committed During Past Insanity
Background
The Amūḷhavinaya (the rules pertaining to insanity) appears in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, reflecting the Buddha's wisdom in addressing the complex ethical matters of the Sangha. This text relates directly to the principle of responsibility for action and karma in Buddhism.
The Vinaya Piṭaka is a collection of monastic rules together with explanatory case studies, established to maintain discipline and harmony within the monastic community. Among its concerns, matters relating to the mental and cognitive state of practitioners hold particular importance, for Buddhism recognizes that an action bears legal and moral consequence only when the agent possesses sufficient cognitive capacity.
Main Content
According to the Amūḷhavinaya, a bhikkhunī who is in a state of unsound mind—amūḷha, meaning one lacking clear discernment, or more specifically, one in a state of insanity—is not held legally responsible for offenses she may have committed. This follows from the fundamental principle that a transgression of the Vinaya is considered to have legal and moral force only when the offender acted with clear awareness, intention, and full cognitive capacity.
If a bhikkhunī has committed actions that, under the rules of the Sangha, would ordinarily be regarded as offenses, but those actions occurred during a period in which she had lost her mental composure, she may be acquitted through a formal declaration concerning her past state of insanity. This declaration—the amūḷhavinaya, the procedure of resolution on account of insanity—allows the Sangha community to recognize that those actions were not the product of conscious choice, and therefore do not give rise to karma commensurate with actions performed with full intentional awareness.
This procedure reflects the profound understanding of human psychology found in Buddhism. A clear and wholesome mind (sammācitta) is an essential condition for an action to bear karmic significance, and when the mind is disturbed or has lost control, the capacity for responsibility is correspondingly diminished.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.