Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bi Pm Pd 10Asking for Dried Meat

Pāli / Sanskrit:Asking for dried meat

📖1,114 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This item is identified only through descriptive information: the Vietnamese title is “Xin Thịt Khô,” the English title is “Asking for Dried Meat,” the number is “Xct Mu Bi Pm Pd 10,” and it belongs to the group “Sectarian Canon · Comparative” and the collection “Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan.” The source URL is given as SuttaCentral, but here there is no full text for direct comparison. Therefore, this interpretation does not claim to be a translation of the original scripture, nor does it assert details of persons, communal context, Vinaya wording, or full classification beyond what the descriptive information provides.

The truncated Vietnamese text ending shows that the prior style was interpreting the matter as a disciplinary rule concerning a renunciant who should not request, ask for, or arouse craving for a specific kind of food, here dried meat. However, the terms and judgments in the truncated passage should be understood as AI interpretation, not as original scriptural wording. To determine the exact Vinaya clause, originating case, and level of offense, the full source text must be compared again.

Context

In the life of alms-round and receiving food, a renunciant does not stand in the position of one who chooses according to preference. His or her sustenance depends upon the faith of donors, and at the same time must be kept within the framework of contentment, fewness of wishes, and knowing sufficiency. Therefore, disciplinary rules related to asking for food are usually intended not only to regulate a particular food item, but also to protect the pure relationship between the Sangha and laypeople.

The title “Asking for Dried Meat” suggests a situation in which a specific food is named as the object of a request. Dried meat, in the ordinary sense, is a prepared and preserved food, which in some circumstances may be considered a delicacy or a valuable food. If a monastic actively asks for such a food because of liking, a habit of enjoyment, or a desire to receive special treatment, then that behavior easily distorts the meaning of the mendicant life.

What is noteworthy is that the focus does not necessarily lie in the food itself, but in the attitude toward food. The same item may be received mindfully if it is voluntarily offered by a donor and accords with the discipline; but it may also become an unwholesome condition if sought with a mind of greed, by improper suggestion, or by applying pressure to laypeople.

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

From the title and the truncated ending, the main theme can be identified as restraint in asking for a special kind of food. “Asking for Dried Meat” shows that the act of asking, rather than the act of eating, is the point to be examined. The number includes the marker “Pd,” which may be related to a group of Vinaya clauses in the system presented by the descriptive information, but without the full text one should not assert the degree of offense or the specific legal formula.

A fitting interpretation is this: a renunciant should not turn the need to sustain the body into an opportunity to nourish craving. When it is necessary to eat, one eats to maintain the body, to continue practice and study, to remove the feeling of hunger, not to adorn the body, seek pleasure, or be better treated than others. If “asking for dried meat” is understood as asking for a special item according to one’s own desire, then that is contrary to the spirit of equality, simplicity, and knowing sufficiency.

The descriptive information also indicates that this item belongs to “Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan,” meaning that it is placed within the scope of comparative Vinaya study, not as an independent doctrinal discourse in the ordinary sense. Therefore, the content should be read as a regulatory fragment, a Vinaya case, or a training topic concerning deportment and the use of food. The important point to preserve is restraint: do not add stories, do not assign specific sayings, and do not name offenders if the data does not provide them.

Meaning for Practice

For a practitioner, food is a very immediate test. Craving for food is often not as coarse as craving for power or wealth, yet it is present regularly, entering small choices: wanting something more delicious, wanting a special portion, wanting others to know one’s preference. The discipline therefore does not merely prevent an external act, but also shines a light on the place where the mind begins to incline toward possession.

The lesson of “Asking for Dried Meat” is learning how to receive just enough. When a renunciant does not demand a special item, he or she protects the donor’s confidence and protects his or her own mind. Laypeople offer freely and joyfully; renunciants receive with gratitude and without demands. The two sides meet in a pure relationship, not governed by inducement, indulgence, or the pursuit of gain.

For laypeople, this item also has practical meaning. Offering is not the satisfaction of an individual’s tastes, but the support of a life of practice. When understood this way, laypeople offer with reverence, do not encourage luxury, and do not use food to create an imbalanced private relationship. What accords with the Dharma lies in the pure mind of both giver and receiver.

In modern life, “dried meat” can be seen as a symbol for everything special that we want reserved for ourselves. A Buddhist practitioner needs to recognize the moment when the mind shifts from need to demand, from use to enjoyment, from knowing sufficiency to seeking. To recognize this is already to begin practicing the discipline in depth.

Comparative Note

Because the full source text is not present in the data, the original circumstances of establishment, source wording, technical terminology, or differences among recensions cannot yet be precisely determined. This section is only an interpretation based on the descriptive information and the truncated text. When comparing the source again, at least three points should be checked: whether the behavior mentioned is direct asking or indirect suggestion; whether the object requested is dried meat in particular or valuable food in general; and how the level of handling in the Vinaya is presented.

Care is also needed with any terms mentioned in the truncated passage if there is no confirmation in the full text. Concepts such as humility, shame regarding the unwholesome, contentment, and non-craving may be used to interpret the meaning for practice, but should not be regarded as quotation or textual conclusion. This item should therefore be kept as a limited AI interpretation, awaiting comparison with the source before being used for rigorous scholarly research.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.