San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Sk 14Nātyavakṛṣṭaṁ prāvariṣyāma
Pāli / Sanskrit:Nātyavakṛṣṭaṁ prāvariṣyāma
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Nātyavakṛṣṭaṁ prāvariṣyāma
AI Explanation — Comparative Vinaya in Sanskrit, Number San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Sk 14
---
Source Status
The text numbered San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Sk 14 belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit collection, within the classification system Sectarian Canon · Comparative. The full Sanskrit source text of this entry has not yet been directly compared in the current database; therefore, the presentation below is not a translation of the original scripture, but an AI explanation built purely from the supplied descriptive information, combined with general knowledge of the scholarly context related to this group of materials. Readers should keep this in mind when consulting it and should not regard it as representing the full original text.
---
Background
The title of the text is Nātyavakṛṣṭaṁ prāvariṣyāma, a classical Sanskrit phrase preserved in its original form in all three columns: Vietnamese title, English title, and Sanskrit title. This shows that this is a Vinaya passage that modern editors have not translated into a modern language, but have preserved in its original Sanskrit form for purposes of scholarly comparison.
The siglum “Sarv” in the code suggests the Sarvāstivāda tradition, one of the major and influential sectarian Buddhist schools of ancient India and Central Asia. The Vinaya of the Sarvāstivāda was recorded in Sanskrit, and many fragments remain in manuscript collections from Central Asia, Kashgar, Gilgit, and other archaeological sites. The siglum “Finot” in the code is likely related to a collection or scholarly edition connected with earlier Buddhist studies, helping to locate the source material in the history of modern Buddhist scholarship.
The abbreviations “Bu” and “Pm” are often used in comparative Vinaya collections to indicate specific rules in the code, for example related to bhikkhus and to a group of disciplinary provisions. However, because the descriptive information does not explicitly explain these symbols, readers should understand this only as a reasoned analysis, not an official determination.
---
Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information
From the Sanskrit phrase Nātyavakṛṣṭaṁ prāvariṣyāma, a preliminary linguistic analysis may be made:
- Nātyavakṛṣṭam: A compound consisting of the negative prefix na, ati (excessive, too much), and the root vakṛṣṭa (related to pulling, dragging, wearing, or draping). The whole phrase may be understood as “not pulled too low” or “not draped excessively downward.”
- Prāvariṣyāma: The first-person plural future form of the root prāvar, meaning “we shall wear, we shall put on a robe.” This verb often appears in Vinaya rules regulating how bhikkhus wear their robes.
Taken together, the phrase may express the general meaning: “We shall wear the robe without letting it hang excessively low”, or an equivalent rule regulating how those who have gone forth should wear their robes, not letting the garment be too long, too low, or dragging on the ground.
If this analysis is on the right track, this is one of many rules in the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya regulating the manner of wearing robes for those who have gone forth, an area to which the Buddhist Vinaya in general gives detailed attention in order to maintain dignity, purity, and restraint of the sense faculties in Sangha life.
---
Meaning for Practice
Although this text is technical and scholarly in nature, its content concerning rules for wearing robes has profound meaning for practice in the Buddhist tradition. The way a renunciant wears robes is not merely an external form, but reflects mindfulness in each small action, from putting on the robe and adjusting it to standing and walking. The Buddha repeatedly emphasized that the deportment of a practitioner, including clothing, is a means of expressing virtue and a condition for worldly people to arouse faith in the Three Jewels.
For modern students of the Buddhadharma, including those who have not received monastic ordination, the spirit of this kind of rule reminds us that attention to each detail in daily life is itself a form of practicing discipline. The Vinaya, though strict and detailed, is not a dogmatic burden but a map guiding practitioners toward comprehensive mindfulness in every circumstance.
In addition, studying the Sanskrit Vinaya of schools such as Sarvāstivāda in comparison with other traditions helps researchers better understand the diversity and unity of early Buddhism, while also appreciating the preservation efforts of generations of monastics and scholars over many centuries.
---
Comparative Notes
- The full original Sanskrit text of this entry has not been directly compared; all analysis above is based purely on descriptive information and semantic analysis of the Sanskrit phrase in the title.
- Researchers wishing to verify the exact content should consult scholarly editions of the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya in Sanskrit available in international specialist Buddhist studies libraries.
- This explanation is introductory and orienting in nature, and does not replace reading and studying the original texts under the guidance of good friends with expertise in Buddhist philology.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.