San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Sk 99Holding a Staff
Pāli / Sanskrit:Daṇḍapāṇi
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Holding a Staff (Daṇḍapāṇi)
San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Sk 99 | Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit | Sectarian Canonical Tradition · Comparative
---
Source Status
The full Sanskrit source text of this Vinaya item has not yet been directly collated in the process of preparing this exposition. The presentation below is not a translation from the original text, but an exposition based purely on the provided descriptive information: sectarian tradition, collection title, scripture number, Vietnamese title, English title, and the Sanskrit term Daṇḍapāṇi. Readers should note this clearly to avoid confusing secondary exposition with the content of the original text. For in-depth study, it is necessary to consult the Sanskrit text or academically authoritative bilingual comparative editions.
---
Background
This Vinaya item belongs to the collection Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit, a genre of comparative Buddhist Vinaya scholarship in which legal provisions from different sectarian traditions are placed side by side in order to identify similarities, differences, and developments of the Vinaya across traditions. The designation San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Sk 99 indicates that this is an item within the systematic organization of this kind of multi-sectarian comparative material, in which "Sk" may indicate the serial number of a specific rule within a related group.
The Sanskrit term Daṇḍapāṇi is compounded from two elements: daṇḍa (staff, rod, stick) and pāṇi (hand). Joined together, Daṇḍapāṇi literally means "one holding a staff in the hand" or "staff in hand," referring to the act or posture of carrying a staff. In the context of the Vinaya, this title usually indicates a provision regulating whether a bhikkhu or śramaṇa is permitted to hold or carry a staff, or to hold a weapon or symbol of authority, and if so under what circumstances it is appropriate.
---
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
Based on the title Daṇḍapāṇi, "Holding a Staff," and the placement of this item in the Sanskrit Comparative Vinaya of the sectarian tradition, it can be generally determined that this provision concerns regulations related to the conduct of carrying a staff by a renunciant. A staff (daṇḍa) in the Buddhist context has many differentiated meanings: from a walking staff for an alms-going śramaṇa, to a symbol of authority or violence, to an implement supporting the elderly or ill.
Across the Vinaya systems of various sectarian traditions, even though the specific details may differ, provisions bearing such a title usually focus on one of the following issues: (1) whether a bhikkhu commits an offense when holding a staff in a threatening posture; (2) limits regarding the type of staff and its purpose; or (3) the attitude of non-violence (ahiṃsā) that a renunciant should express through bodily action, including the manner of holding objects. Since this is sectarian comparative material, the content very likely presents how various sects regulated the same act of holding a staff, thereby showing development or divergence in the Vinaya traditions.
However, because the full text is lacking, the exact content, structure of presentation, or comparative conclusion offered by the document cannot be confirmed.
---
Meaning for Practice and Study
The provision on "Holding a Staff" reflects a profound principle of renunciant life: bodily conduct must accord with mental conduct. A Buddhist monastic not only avoids violent actions in terms of inner intention, but also attends to how the body expresses itself outwardly, including how objects are held, postures of standing and sitting, and signals of body language.
Daṇḍa, the staff, may in the practice of religious life be a legitimate means, supporting walking, driving away animals, or being used during walking meditation; yet it can also easily become a symbol of power, intimidation, or latent violence. Through detailed provisions like this, the Vinaya trains renunciants in the ability to make subtle distinctions between the proper use of a means and the habit of clinging to forms.
Furthermore, in the context of sectarian comparison, studying this provision helps practitioners and scholars understand that the Vinaya is not a rigid and uniform system, but a living tradition in which different communities responded to the same practical challenge in ways suited to their geographic, cultural, and historical circumstances. The spirit behind the rules, preserving purity, non-violence, and not causing fear in others, remains consistent, even though its expressions may vary.
---
Comparative Note
Because the Sanskrit full text of item San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Sk 99 has not yet been directly collated, all exposition above is only general, based on the linguistic meaning of Daṇḍapāṇi and the common features of sectarian comparative Vinaya material. Serious researchers should seek out the original Sanskrit texts, as well as relevant bilingual editions or scholarly commentaries, in order to verify and supplement the content accurately.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.