San Mg Bu Pm Sk 65On Plants
Pāli / Sanskrit:Hariteuccāra
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Hariteuccāra Sutta (Sutta on Plants)
Background
The Hariteuccāra Sutta is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon, the section that sets out detailed regulations for the conduct of the monastic community. This text is recorded among the Saṅghādisesa rules, which concern the Sangha, and the Pācittiya rules, offenses requiring confession. The title “Hariteuccāra” means “matters concerning green plants” or “the care of vegetation,” reflecting an aspect of practice related to nature and the living environment.
In the context of early Buddhism, rules concerning conduct toward plants are not merely matters of discipline, but also express the principle of ahiṃsā (non-harming). These regulations arose from specific situations in the monastic community, when the Buddha and his disciples saw the need to establish actions consistent with the Dharma and with ethics.
Main Content
The Hariteuccāra Sutta refers to actions concerning plants and grasses that monks and nuns should avoid or correct. In particular, the sutta states that bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs should not destroy plants and grasses heedlessly or intentionally, because such action violates the principle of “not killing living beings” (pāṇātipāta) and “not harming other living beings” (ahiṃsā).
Specific regulations include actions such as burning grass, destroying tree roots, cutting branches unnecessarily, or using harmful substances to kill plants. These actions are regarded as violations of ethical rules, because in Buddhist philosophy, plants and grasses, even as the simplest forms of life, are considered to possess life, and harming them shows a lack of loving-kindness (mettā) and wisdom (paññā).
The sutta may also refer to exempted cases, such as when grass must be cut to clean an area of practice, or when removing plants is necessary to protect the health of the community. These exceptions show that Buddhism is not an absolutist system, but a flexible path of practice that weighs context and intention (cetanā).
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.