Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Np 14A New Blanket Should be Kept for Six Years

Pāli / Sanskrit:Chabbassa

📖962 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This item has been regenerated as an AI interpretation based on the descriptive information and the truncated ending of the Vietnamese text. The data indicates that the code is Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Np 14, belonging to the Comparative Chinese Vinaya, with the Vietnamese title “Y Mới Phải Giữ Sáu Năm,” the English title “A New Blanket Should be Kept for Six Years,” and the Pali title “Chabbassa.” The data has a source link, but there has been no direct comparison with the full source text within the scope of this processing. Therefore, the details of the occasion, original terminology, the precise object in question, or the full conditions of exemption cannot be affirmed if the source has not been checked.

Context

From the title, this item relates to keeping a new object for six years, called “new robe” in Vietnamese and “new blanket” in English. This difference in naming needs to be viewed cautiously: the descriptive information shows that the theme relates to a cloth item in monastic life, but there is not enough data to determine with certainty the scope of the item according to the original text. In discipline, robes and daily implements are not merely personal belongings; they are connected with the principles of fewness of wishes, contentment, responsibility, and non-wastefulness for practitioners.

The truncated ending shows that the earlier passage interpreted the rule in the direction that monastics should not deny responsibility for a robe or object they have received, and should not neglect it or change it arbitrarily before the six-year period. The style emphasizes honesty, responsibility, and reasonable use of entrusted property. This is an understanding consistent with the general spirit of rules related to requisites: restraining the mind that craves what is new and protecting a simple life.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

It can be determined with certainty that the rule revolves around the period of six years in relation to a new object. From the Pali title Chabbassa, the focus may be understood as “six years,” but this regenerated version does not affirm the terminological structure or Vinaya details beyond the descriptive information. The code belongs to the Np group, but the specific penalty should not be elaborated if the data does not provide it.

The truncated ending says that the rule arises from the principle of not denying the use of an item one has received. It also states that a practitioner should not say the object is not one’s own or intentionally neglect it before six years have passed. These details allow the interpretation that the rule is intended to train responsible receiving. Once an item has been received, the practitioner should not treat it as something replaceable according to preference. The item is used to support the life of practice, not to nourish consumer choice.

The truncated passage mentions three robes and some terms, but because the source has not been checked, that list should not be confirmed as accurate for this item. It should also be noted that the English descriptive information uses “blanket,” while the Vietnamese uses “new robe.” Therefore, the safest interpretation is to speak of a cloth item or robe-requisite in monastic life, with the principle of preserving it for six years, rather than affirming the detailed type of robe, its name, and exceptions.

Meaning for Practice

The meaning for practice of the “six years” rule lies in training the mind in contentment. Practitioners do not only abandon major desires; they also need to recognize small desires, such as liking new things, becoming tired of old things, or wanting to change requisites for convenience or appearance. These desires may seem slight, but if they are not illuminated, they gradually incline the renunciant life toward accumulation and personal preference.

Keeping an object for a long time is a practice in endurance. It reminds practitioners that the value of a robe or requisite does not lie in its newness, beauty, or pleasant feeling, but in its function of supporting the holy life. A robe or cloth item, while still usable, should be cared for, patched, and used appropriately. This very care reduces wastefulness and increases gratitude toward donors or the community that has offered support.

This rule also relates to honesty. If a practitioner tries to speak evasively, deny responsibility, or intentionally neglect an item in order to have a pretext for receiving a new one, then the issue is no longer the object but a dishonest mind. Thus discipline enters deeply into very ordinary places: how one stores, uses, receives, and lets go. Through this, monastic life is not separate from daily activities, but is expressed directly within daily activities.

For Buddhist students who are not monastics, this lesson still has value. Modern consumer culture often encourages constant replacement, making the mind less able to be content. Practicing in the spirit of this rule means learning to use things longer, care for them better, and distinguish true need from boredom. When the pursuit of new things is reduced, the mind has more space for mindfulness, gratitude, and inner freedom.

Comparative Note

There has been no comparison with the full source text for item Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Np 14. This regenerated version does not confirm whether the precise object in the original is a robe, blanket, sitting cloth, or another kind of fabric; nor does it confirm exceptions, procedures, or penalties. When conditions allow source checking, the Vietnamese title should be compared with the English title “new blanket,” and the scope of the item and the six-year period should be examined as presented in the Vinaya text. At present, this is a limited AI interpretation, keeping the focus on contentment, responsibility, and non-wastefulness.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.