Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Sk 67Mouth Full
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sakabaḷa
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This item has the code Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Sk 67, belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese group, and bears the Vietnamese title “Mouth Full,” the English title “Mouth Full,” and the Pali title “Sakabaḷa.” The data does not contain the complete source text or a full translation, but only a truncated ending section of the Vietnamese text that speaks about eating, maturity in practice, and the relationship between receiving food and meditative concentration and wisdom. Therefore, this section is not a verbatim translation of the Vinaya text.
From the data, it is not possible to determine the circumstances of the rule’s formulation, the specific object, the Chinese wording, or the degree of detail in the training rule. Nor should one assert the number of precepts, recitation ritual, or any system of classification beyond the given descriptive information, because such matters require comparison with the source. The explanation below is based only on the title and the remaining context: a practitioner should not eat with the mouth full in a manner lacking deportment.
Context
The title “Mouth Full” points to a very ordinary action: putting too much food into the mouth, causing the mouth to bulge, making it difficult to chew, swallow, or speak with dignity, and giving an impression of coarseness. In Vinaya life, eating is an important field because it directly touches craving, bodily habit, contentment, and one’s relationship with donors or those eating together.
A monastic does not eat with enjoyment as the primary goal, nor eat to express luxury or indulgence. The meal is a means of sustaining the body. For this very reason, the way of eating must go together with mindfulness. A person may speak much about the Dharma, but if, while eating, he or she is hurried, stuffs the mouth full, and shows a greedy haste, that bodily action weakens the persuasive force of the religious life. Vinaya discipline does not separate doctrine from the meal, because craving often appears very clearly in eating.
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
From the descriptive information, it can be determined that this training rule concerns not letting the mouth be full when eating. The truncated ending emphasizes that this is not a small matter, because eating behavior expresses the mind and one’s cultivation. This accords with the general spirit of regulations on deportment: daily bodily conduct is where wakeful awareness is tested. However, one should not add details about the original text, such as the setting of the meal, kind of food, or specific words of instruction, if the data does not provide them.
The content may be explained as follows: when receiving food, a practitioner should take a moderate amount for each mouthful, chew and swallow with awareness, and not fill the mouth to the point where dignity is difficult to maintain. “Mouth full” is not only a matter of appearance. When the mouth is too full, the body falls into a state dominated by food; breath, movement of the jaw, gaze, and attention are all drawn along by a sense of haste. Others who see this may also give rise to unease or lack of respect toward the monastic way of life.
This training rule also implies contentment in each bite of food. Greed for food does not always appear as the desire for delicious dishes; sometimes it is expressed through placing too much food in the mouth, wanting to swallow quickly, wanting to seize the sensation. Vinaya discipline cuts through that coarseness with a very concrete rule: do not let the mouth be full. It is this concrete so that the practitioner cannot hide in abstract reasoning.
Meaning for Practice
The meaning for practice of this item lies in taming craving through the meal. A practitioner does not need to dislike food, but needs to see food as a condition for sustaining the body, not as an object for the mind to chase after. When placing each moderate mouthful into the mouth, one practices knowing limits. Knowing limits in a bite of food is a small but real step; it helps the mind become accustomed to stopping before excess.
Eating without a full mouth is also the practice of mindfulness of the body. The eater knows that he or she is taking food, raising it, placing it in the mouth, chewing, and swallowing. This rhythm need not be artificially slow, but it must be clear enough not to be swept away. If the mind is hurried while eating, the hand will be hurried, the mouth will be full, and the breath will be heavy. If the mind knows itself, the amount of food in each bite naturally becomes more moderate.
In a community of practice, deportment in eating preserves common purity. A person who eats too quickly, with the mouth full, producing sounds or an unrefined appearance, can make it difficult for others to collect the mind. A person who eats calmly, moderately, and discreetly helps the meal become part of the Dharma hall. Such dignity is not for display, but so that all may remember together that eating too is practice.
For laypeople, this lesson is especially close to modern life. Many people eat in haste, eating while looking at screens, working, or talking, to the point that they no longer know what they are eating. The training rule “Mouth Full” reminds us to return to simplicity: take one moderate bite, know that one is chewing while chewing, know that one is swallowing while swallowing, and stop when the body has had enough. From a mindful meal, the mind becomes less coarse, speech less rushed, and life less driven by immediate desire.
Collation Note
There is no complete source text for determining the Chinese term corresponding to “mouth full,” the scope of application, or the specific context of the training rule. The English title “Mouth Full” and the Pali “Sakabaḷa” only help identify the general theme, and are not enough to confirm details about ritual, the number of precepts, or parallel versions. When the full source is available, it will be necessary to compare the position of this item within the group of training rules on receiving food and to see how the text describes the conduct to be avoided. In the present state, the above is an AI explanation of the meaning of deportment, not a verbatim translation.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.