Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bu Pm Pd 2Letting a Nun Order Food

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dutiyapāṭidesanīya

📖302 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

SUTTA ON LETTING A NUN ORDER FOOD

Background

The Dutiyapāṭidesanīya Sutta (the Second Public Declaration) is an important part of the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon, specifically found in the Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga, the analysis concerning nuns. This discourse relates to a special regulation on delicate conduct between bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs.

The background of the discourse arose when the Buddha admitted nuns and established the true Dharma (Sāsana) for the female renunciant community. In this process, many practical issues of monastic communal life needed regulation. The Dutiyapāṭidesanīya Sutta records a specific situation: the issue of a nun asking a bhikkhu to buy food for her. At first glance, this seems ordinary, but it contains risks concerning discipline and the abuse of power in the monastic community.

Main Content

In the situation described, a nun asked a bhikkhu to buy or order food for her. At first hearing, this action appears harmless, an act of mutual assistance. However, the Buddha and his Blessed arahants recognized that without clear regulations, this situation could easily be abused. A nun might take advantage of it to ask for things beyond basic needs, or male bhikkhus might be placed in a difficult position, regarded as serving or favoring particular nuns.

Therefore, the Buddha set forth a Pāṭidesanīya, a public declaration, requiring that a nun should not ask a bhikkhu to buy or order food for her. If the nun violates this, she must publicly declare the violation before the bhikkhunī community. Similarly, a bhikkhu should not actively buy food at a nun’s request in this way.

This regulation is a “declaration” (pāṭidesanīya), not a Pārājika (defeat offense) or Saṅghādisesa (an offense requiring communal consideration). This means that the violation is not among the gravest offenses, but still requires public acknowledgment and correction of conduct.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.