Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pc 22Eating More After Refusing an Invitation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Pavāraṇā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of the Pavāraṇā Sutta (Eating More After Refusing an Invitation)
Background
Pavāraṇā is a regulation in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, belonging to the Pātimokkha section, the basic discipline. This regulation reflects the Buddha’s carefulness regarding the eating behavior of bhikkhus, especially in the context of a monastic community living dependent on the generosity of the people.
During the formative period of Buddhism, bhikkhus had to observe the principle of moderation in eating (bhojane mattaññutā), knowing the proper measure. Pavāraṇā refers to a specific situation: when a bhikkhu refuses an invitation to eat from a layperson, perhaps because he is satisfied or is following the instruction of his teacher, but afterward continues to eat more, this is regarded as a violation of discipline.
This regulation is not about forbidding pleasure as such, but about truthfulness, self-discipline (saṁvara), and respect for the intention of the donor. It arose from a specific incident in the monastic community, when some monastics acted without straightforwardness in relation to food.
Main Content
According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, the offending action is clearly defined: when a bhikkhu refuses a portion of food or an invitation to eat from the host (pavāretvā, "having refused, having declined"), but then still eats, or especially eats more, this is a contradiction between action and intention. Such conduct causes the donor to lose trust, because they respected the bhikkhu’s wish when he declined, only then to see the monastic continue eating.
The basic principle here is truthfulness, the absence of false speech (amusāvāda). A bhikkhu should decide clearly: if he is not eating, he should not eat; if he is eating, he should accept the invitation straightforwardly. Doing the opposite shows a division between word and action, contrary to the practice principles of the Saṅgha.
The disciplinary text also notes that this action can cause distress in the community and shake laypeople’s trust in the integrity of the Saṅgha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.