Lzh Mu Bi Pm Np 8Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund
Pāli / Sanskrit:Upakkhata
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This item has been rewritten as a Vietnamese AI interpretation, not as a literal translation. The data provides the number “Lzh Mu Bi Pm Np 8,” the Vietnamese title “Xin Y Tốt Từ Quỹ Y,” the English title “Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund,” the Pali/comparative title “Upakkhata,” the tradition “Comparative Sectarian Scriptures,” the collection “Comparative Vinaya — Chinese,” and the source path. The remaining ending speaks about not asking for precious or luxurious requisites from a common fund, needing humility, freedom from greed, asking only for what is truly necessary, and its relation to the principle of using communal property.
Within the scope of the data currently available, there is no full source text to verify. The exact Chinese wording, the circumstance of establishment, the persons involved in the event, or procedural details in the Vinaya cannot yet be determined. Therefore, the version below only develops points that can be determined from the descriptive information and the truncated ending, while avoiding mention of scriptural details, persons, chapters, specific parallel sources, or the Buddha’s exact words when they are not provided by the data.
Context
The title “Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund” shows that this item relates to asking for robes that are good, beautiful, valuable, or beyond the ordinary level from a prepared source of requisites. The expression “robe fund” in the title suggests a fund or source of offerings intended for robes, but no further understanding of the form of fund management should be added without the original text. What can be grasped with certainty is that the issue lies not only in whether one has a robe or not, but in the attitude when requesting a robe of higher quality.
In the monastic life, robes are essential requisites. However, when there is already a common source of property or a source of offerings intended for robes, the recipient may give rise to a mind of selection. From reasonable selection based on real need, the mind may shift toward liking softness, beauty, refinement, or difference from others. The rule concerning requesting fine robes from a robe fund reminds us that communal requisites should be approached with contentment and integrity. If practitioners use religious status or communal relationships to direct that fund toward personal benefit, the purity of the offering will be damaged.
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
From the Vietnamese and English titles, the theme can be determined as the act of requesting fine robes from a robe fund. From the number containing the sign “Np,” it may be noted that this item belongs to a group of rules connected with the handling of objects and confession, but this interpretation does not affirm any specific procedure. The truncated ending indicates that the focus is not seeking precious or luxurious requisites from a common source; the recipient needs to be humble, free from greed, and ask only for what is truly necessary for maintaining the life of practice.
The remaining passage also states that if one requests clothing that is too refined without a legitimate reason, this is contrary to the spirit of the Dharma. Examples such as illness, severe climate, or special duties appear in the ending, but because they have not been checked against the source, they should be regarded as part of the previous interpretation rather than as a list of conditions confirmed from the original text. The main point may be retained: special needs may be considered, but preference for comfort and luxury is not a reason in accordance with the Dharma.
The ending also mentions principles concerning what is allowable in the use of communal property. Although the terminology recorded in the old passage has not been verified, the general content remains consistent with the theme: communal property should be used according to need, not according to craving. Robes are used to cover the body, preserve health, and support the holy life; they are not a means of adorning the self.
Meaning for Practice
The meaning for practice of this item lies in recognizing the subtlety of craving. Craving is not only expressed as wanting much, but also as wanting what is better, more beautiful, softer, rarer, or specially prepared for oneself. A request that seems small may show that the mind is placing comfort above alertness. When practitioners know how to stop before that choice, they are practicing renunciation in daily life itself.
For monastics, a robe fund or a common source of offerings is the faith of many people. Each item used should be seen as support for the path, not as personal property to be demanded at will. When used with a contented mind, an offering becomes meaningful: even a plain robe can support the holy life if used with mindfulness. Conversely, a fine robe that comes from a demanding mind can become a condition that makes the mind heavy.
For the community, this regulation protects fairness. If a common fund is directed according to the preferences of a few people, others may lose trust in the use of material goods. If everyone maintains the principle of sufficient need, the community will be less burdened by dispute. Laypeople also see that their offerings are not turned into an opportunity to increase comforts, but are placed within a pure framework.
Note on Comparison
The detailed content of “Upakkhata” in this item cannot yet be determined without reading the full source text. One should not state with certainty the exceptional conditions, the method of distributing the robe fund, the managers, the procedure for handling the matter, or its correspondence with other transmissions. When the Chinese text and parallel translation are available, the title, scope of the rule, technical terminology, and all details interpreted here need to be checked again. This version only aims to replace the truncated Vietnamese text with a cautious interpretation, preserving the five content sections and not pretending that the full source is already available.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.