Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bu Vb Np 8Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund

Pāli / Sanskrit:Upakkhata

📖947 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This entry is an AI interpretation based on the supplied descriptive information and a truncated ending of the Vietnamese text; it is not a translation of the original scripture, nor is it a verified parallel checked against the full Chinese text. The available data indicates that the item code is Lzh Mi Bu Vb Np 8, belonging to the Chinese Parallels Vinaya group within the Sectarian Buddhist Texts tradition, with the Vietnamese title “Xin Y Tốt Từ Quỹ Y,” the English title “Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund,” and the Pali name “Upakkhata.” Since the full source text is not present in the data, the origin story, the wording of the rule, the analysis of terms, or the cases of allowance cannot be determined with certainty.

Therefore, the content below presents only points that may be cautiously inferred from the title, the Vinaya classification, and the truncated ending. Details such as who was the first offender, who established the robe fund, what form the request for robes took, or the precise conditions for an offense all need to be checked directly against the source text before being used as scholarly data.

Background

In the life of renunciation, clothing is one of the basic requisites. A monastic needs robes to cover the body, preserve proper deportment, and adapt to the climate, but the use of robes must not be separated from the ideal of fewness of wishes, contentment, and purity in material things. When robes become an object of choosing what is superior or inferior, seeking fine kinds, or maneuvering to receive the better share, this can weaken the life of non-accumulation and give rise to comparison within the Sangha.

The title “Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund” suggests a situation in which material resources have been set aside for robe offerings, but a monastic may try to direct that distribution toward personal benefit, especially in regard to robes finer than usual. The essential point lies not only in the article, the robe, but in the attitude toward communal property or property offered by donors out of faith. A robe fund, if there is one, must be used in a spirit of fairness, according to need, in accordance with the rule, and not become a means of nourishing fondness for comfort.

Content That Can Be Determined From the Descriptive Information

From the designation Np in the item code, it may be understood that this belongs to the class of rules concerning material goods that need to be handled according to prescribed Vinaya procedures, but the data does not provide enough text to determine the full mechanism of handling in this Chinese version. The English title “Requesting Fine Robes From a Robe Fund” shows that the focus is the act of requesting fine robes in relation to a fund or source of material resources set aside for robes. The Pali name “Upakkhata” is identifying data, but one should not infer too much from it about the entire content without checking the source.

The truncated ending emphasizes that a monastic should not arbitrarily request a better robe without a legitimate circumstance, while placing the issue within the Vinaya principle of simple living and the management of communal property. That passage also clearly raises the danger of disputes and harm to Sangha harmony when property is not distributed transparently. However, the examples in the ending should be regarded as an existing interpretation of the truncated item, not as complete evidence for the original regulation.

Thus it can be cautiously determined that this entry revolves around the limits of demanding or influencing matters in order to obtain fine robes, especially when such robes fall within the sphere of property prepared for the Sangha or for robe distribution. The main idea is to prevent offerings from being transformed into objects of personal possession.

Meaning for Practice

The prominent lesson for practice is alertness toward the mind that wants the better share. In the renunciant life, it is not only great desires that must be restrained; even a small choice regarding the material, color, newness, beauty, or comfort of a robe may reveal a tendency toward attachment to self. When the mind considers itself more deserving, more entitled to priority, or fit to receive the finer portion, the practice has departed from the foundation of contentment.

Vinaya rules concerning robes help the practitioner examine the relationship between need and desire. Need is what is necessary to maintain life and proper deportment; desire is the addition produced by comparison, preference, and clinging. A monastic may need a suitable robe, but should not for that reason turn what is needed into a right to demand. This subtle boundary is precisely what makes the Vinaya a Dharma practice, not merely a system of administration.

For the community, this rule protects donors’ confidence and internal harmony. When offered goods are handled transparently, the donor is not suspected of favoritism, the recipient is not suspected of lobbying, and the Sangha is not divided over material things. Fairness in small matters is the foundation for purity in great matters.

Notes on Collation

The full text at the source named in the descriptive information must be checked before affirming details about the origin story, the scope of the offense, exceptions, terminology, or handling procedure. This interpretation does not itself confirm the canonical location, translator, chapter division, or original wording beyond the data supplied. In scholarly editing, this entry should be placed in the status “AI interpretation requiring collation,” and used only as an orienting reading on the topic: restraint in requesting fine robes from a source of material resources designated for robes.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.