Lzh Mg Bi Vb Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Sutta on Criticizing the Distribution of Robes
Dubbala — Early Buddhist Vinaya
Background
In the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, the Dubbala falls within the Pātimokkha — the code of discipline that monks and nuns are required to uphold. Specifically, the matter regulated here belongs to the domain of Pācittiya (minor offenses requiring confession), and concerns the ethical conduct of members of the Saṅgha when handling material goods — in particular, robes (cīvara).
Robes are not merely garments that protect the body; they are also a symbol of renunciation and of the conduct proper to one who trains in the Buddha-Dhamma. The manner of distributing and using robes, as regulated by the Blessed One, reflects the spirit of non-greed and non-contention that characterizes the monastic community. The Dubbala sets forth a form of ethical violation related to this matter — specifically, the act of criticizing or finding fault with the Saṅgha's manner of distributing robes.
The historical origin of this rule is bound up with specific situations that arose in the life of the Saṅgha during the time of the Buddha. When grievances or perceived unfairness arose in the distribution of material goods, certain monks began to voice their complaints openly, giving rise to division and discord within the community. It was for this reason that the Blessed One established this rule, in order to protect harmony and mutual respect.
Principal Content
The Dubbala stipulates that a monk or nun may not openly criticize, find fault with, or speak ill of the manner in which the Saṅgha distributes robes. Even if one harbors a personal grievance, a monastic should not employ public speech to pass judgment, especially in the presence of laypeople — those who are not monastics. Such conduct is considered a Pācittiya offense — a breach of ethical discipline requiring confession.
The deeper reason underlying this rule is not to conceal wrongdoing. On the contrary, the Blessed One taught that public disputes over material goods cause harm to the reputation of the Saṅgha and erode the faith of those who have taken refuge in the Buddha-Dhamma.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.