Lzh Mg Bi Pm Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Sutta on Criticizing the Distribution of Robes (Dubbala)
Background
The Dubbala is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, specifically within the Pātimokkha — the fundamental code of discipline for monks and nuns. The context in which this text arose is connected to issues concerning the distribution of robes within the Saṅgha during the lifetime of the Buddha.
In ancient Indian society, robes were not merely a material necessity but also a symbol of social standing and distinction. As Buddhism grew, the monastic community required clear rules to prevent disputes, division, and the corruption of virtue and discipline. The Dubbala was established to address cases of criticism and complaint regarding the distribution of robes within the community, as such conduct could give rise to envy, discord, and obstacles to spiritual practice.
Main Content
This text sets forth regulations concerning improper criticism or fault-finding related to the distribution of robes among members of the Saṅgha. Specifically, it prohibits bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs from voicing criticism or directing how others should distribute robes among themselves, unless there is a legitimate reason or authorization from the Saṅgha.
Conduct that violates this rule — classified as a Pācittiya offense, requiring confession and expiation — includes situations such as a monastic without cause criticizing the manner in which robes are distributed to junior members or to other fellow monastics, or attacking the robe-distribution decisions of those in authority. This reflects a foundational principle established by the Buddha: members of the Saṅgha should respect collective decisions and avoid giving rise to needless disputes over communal property.
The deeper reason is that the Buddha understood how small disputes over material possessions could blossom into great conflicts, diminishing the collective spirit of practice, eroding the faith of the lay community, and causing harm to the flourishing of the Dhamma. Therefore, the Buddha required that monks and nuns maintain silence, or that they hold appropriate authority, before commenting on such matters.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.