Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Ka Bu Pm Pj 4Laying False Claim to Superhuman Attainments

Pāli / Sanskrit:Uttarimanussadhamma

📖291 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Rule on Falsely Claiming Superhuman Qualities

Context

The Uttarimanussadhamma rule, falsely claiming superhuman qualities, is recorded in the Vinaya Pitaka of the Pali Canon, specifically in the Khandhakas within the Bhikkhuni Vibhanga, the Vinaya section for bhikkhunis. This rule arose from the need to govern and protect the community of monks and nuns from unethical conduct: falsely claiming superhuman qualities one has not attained.

In the context of early Buddhism, the demands of noble practice and moral development created occasions for spiritual laxity. Some people, out of ambition or delusion, might claim that they had attained high spiritual states, such as entry into meditative absorptions (jhana), attainment of noble fruits (ariya-phala), or possession of supernormal powers, in order to gain fame, offerings, or the reverence of others. This damaged trust in the Sangha and confused those who truly practiced with those who were false.

Main Content

This rule sets forth a clear principle: one must not falsely claim to possess superhuman abilities (uttarimanussadhamma), that is, qualities beyond those of ordinary human beings. These abilities include attainment of meditative absorptions, supernormal knowledge (abhiñña), or realization of noble fruits (phala-sacchikiriya).

The content of the rule reflects a fundamental principle of Buddhist ethics: truthfulness (sacca) and purity (soceyyaṃ). When a person publicly claims what they have not actually attained, this is not only a direct act of lying, but also a direct violation of the trust of the community of practice. The rule states clearly that this act is a violation of one of the most serious disciplinary rules.

In particular, the rule emphasizes that this claim must be public, that is, known by at least one other person, because its public nature damages the shared trust of the Sangha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.