Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Dg Bu Pm Ss 9Making an Accusation Out of Anger on an Irrelevant Pretext

Pāli / Sanskrit:Aññabhāgiya

📖284 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Aññabhāgiya Sutra: Making an Accusation Out of Anger on an Invalid Pretext

Background

The Aññabhāgiya Sutra (accusation on an unrelated ground) is recorded in the Vinaya Pitaka and reflects practical situations that arose in the monastic community of early Buddhism. This sutra clearly describes a case of violating the Vinaya by bhikkhus when they allow anger to govern their actions in accusing other practitioners.

The historical context shows that during the Buddha’s lifetime, the monastic community sometimes faced internal disputes. Some practitioners, when feeling dissatisfied or offended, might exploit disciplinary regulations to take revenge or seek a public apology from another, rather than being motivated by a genuine wish to protect the Dhamma or the rules of practice.

In that context, the Buddha taught that accusations must have a proper foundation, be motivated by loving-kindness (mettā), and aim at protecting the Dhamma, not arise from anger or personal hostility.

Main Content

The Aññabhāgiya Sutra deals with the case in which one bhikkhu accuses another bhikkhu of an offense unrelated to what actually made him upset. For example, a practitioner may feel angry for some personal reason, perhaps because he was slighted, not recognized, or not treated respectfully, but instead of resolving the issue mindfully, he searches for a fault in the other person and accuses him publicly.

The distinctive point of this sutra is that it distinguishes between a legitimate accusation, related to an actual violation of the Vinaya, and an accusation made out of anger, on an unrelated pretext. This is a violation of the Vinaya at the Saṅghādisesa or Pācittiya level, depending on the degree and nature of the act.

The Buddha taught that accusations must be carefully examined.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.