Lzh Dg Bu Pm 2 Ss 9Making an Accusation Out of Anger on an Irrelevant Pretext
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aññabhāgiya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Aññabhāgiya Sutta: Accusation Based on an Irrelevant Pretext
Background
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta appears in the Vinaya Piṭaka, especially in the section regulating Sangha discipline. The background of this scripture concerns disputes arising in the monastic community, when a member intentionally makes an unfair accusation against another based on reasons unrelated to the substance of the matter, what may be called an “accusation on an irrelevant pretext” (aññabhāgiya).
In the context of early Buddhism, the Buddha and his disciples often faced situations caused by minds obscured by greed, hatred, and delusion, the mental poisons. When anger (dosa) flares up, people easily use any opportunity to criticize others publicly, even when the reason given is entirely unrelated to the actual problematic action. This scripture guides the Sangha to recognize and handle such situations wisely.
Main Content
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta concerns a specific disciplinary violation: a person initiates an accusation (āpatti-patikkhanda) against a fellow practitioner, but the accusation is not about the action that is truly at fault; rather, it concerns something entirely different, an issue “outside the main matter” (aññabhāgiya). This is a subtle form of deception: the accuser may not be lying completely, but deliberately diverts the matter, using a minor or irrelevant issue to conceal the real motive, usually anger or jealousy.
In the Vinaya Piṭaka, this conduct is considered a serious disciplinary fault because it undermines trust and harmony in the Sangha. Not every accusation is wrong; Buddhism has formal procedures for handling real violations. But accusation on an irrelevant pretext means using that procedure improperly, manipulating it for personal motives.
The scripture states clearly that one who initiates an accusation on an irrelevant pretext must be censured and required to admit the fault.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.