Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Dg Bi Pm Pc 73Dildos

Pāli / Sanskrit:Jatumaṭṭhaka

📖295 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Jatumaṭṭhaka Discourse (Four Objects)

Background

The Jatumaṭṭhaka discourse is recorded in the Pātimokkha within the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa section. This discourse appears in the context of the Buddha and the bhikkhus in the early Sangha community, when principles concerning ornaments and personal objects were strictly regulated.

The name “Jatumaṭṭhaka” (Pāli: jatu = four, maṭṭhaka = head, or more broadly interpreted as “four constructed things/four kinds of objects”) relates to regulations concerning the objects that a bhikkhu is permitted to own and use. This discourse is an indispensable part of building Sangha discipline, intended to protect the spirit of practice and avoid unnecessary attention.

Main Content

Although the detailed content of this text has not yet been fully translated in the present document, according to the general context of the Theravāda Vinaya Piṭaka, this discourse is often related to the four kinds of requisites a bhikkhu is permitted to possess: robe (cīvara), alms bowl (patta), sitting mat (nisīdana), and another item connected with hygiene or bodily protection.

The Buddha specified disciplinary rules concerning possession of objects not to create hardship, but so that monastics would focus inwardly and not be drawn away by appearances or the accumulation of property. In the Vinaya Piṭaka, every regulation has a story behind it, usually because certain bhikkhus committed a violation and the Buddha then established a precept so that the Sangha would remain harmonious and pure.

This discourse emphasizes the principle of “minimalism” in the renunciant life. Bhikkhus should not possess too many personal objects, lest they become a burden to themselves and to the Sangha. This expresses the special character of the path of renunciation, the path of abandoning material bonds in order to attain liberation (nirvana).

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.