Bu Pc 8383. Entering a royal compound unannounced
Pāli / Sanskrit:Antepura
A monk who enters the bedroom of a king must confess the offense.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of Bu Pc 83: Entering the Inner Chamber of the Royal Palace Without Announcement
Background
Rule 83 belongs to the Pācittiya class, a category of offenses in the Theravāda Vinaya requiring confession before the Sangha. This rule reflects an early period of Buddhism when monks still maintained relationships with royal families—the most powerful figures, possessing the greatest independence and privacy. The rule was established not out of fear of nighttime intruders or delicate needs, but to protect the honor of the Buddhist community in the eyes of the king.
The inner chamber of the royal palace (antepura) is the most private of places, where the king and queen take their rest. A monk entering unannounced is regarded as an act of disrespect toward the sovereign's privacy, and at the same time opens the door to unnecessary misunderstandings regarding the intentions of the Sangha. In the spirit of the Vinaya, the Buddha instructed his disciples to be circumspect in their conduct, so as to protect the holy Dharma from baseless suspicion.
Main Content
The rule is established as follows: if a bhikkhu enters the sleeping quarters of a king without prior announcement or without having been granted permission, he commits a Pācittiya offense and must confess before another bhikkhu or before the assembled Sangha.
This does not apply in cases where the king has formally extended an invitation or where announcement has been clearly given. This distinction is important: the rule does not prohibit interaction with persons of power, but only requires that such interaction be conducted in accordance with proper courtesy. This approach reflects a deep principle of the Vinaya—not the spiritual isolation of oneself from the world, but rather living within the world with mindfulness and responsibility.
The Pācittiya offense (pācittiya pāp) is lighter than the Pārājika offense (equivalent to spiritual capital punishment) or the Saṅghādisesa, yet it still requires public confession. This confession is not a mere ordinary apology—it is a spiritual procedure by which the monk restores the purity of his conduct.
Practical Significance
Beyond its historical context, this rule contains a profound lesson for those engaged in practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.