Lzh Mi Bu Vb Pc 65Royal Compounds
Pāli / Sanskrit:Antepura
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Antepura Discourse (Royal Compounds)
Background
The Antepura Discourse (Antepura Vatthu) is part of the Vinaya Piṭaka, belonging to the Vibhaṅga, the book that analyzes the disciplinary rules in detail, in the Pali Canon. The coding of the text indicates that this is a regulation concerning the inner spaces of royal compounds.
According to the Theravāda tradition, these regulations were established by the Buddha in the course of refining the rules of the Sangha. The originating context is often connected with specific events in the ancient kingdoms of India, where contact between male monastics and women was managed carefully. The royal inner compound (antepura) was the private space of the royal family, filled with women, princesses, and palace attendants. This was an area into which bhikkhus were not to enter unexpectedly or without invitation.
This regulation reflects the Buddha’s care in protecting the integrity of the Sangha, those who had gone forth and renounced sensual desire, as well as respect for the social rules of the age.
Main Content
The regulation concerning Antepura chiefly revolves around the principle that bhikkhus are not permitted to enter the royal inner compound except in clearly permitted cases. If they need to enter, they must have permission from the king or from the person authorized to manage that place.
This rule has several protective purposes: first, to avoid inappropriate appearances or situations likely to give rise to public suspicion; second, to protect the women in the inner compound from unnecessary interactions; third, to maintain the purity (brahmacariya) of the bhikkhus themselves.
If a bhikkhu enters the inner compound unnecessarily or enters without permission, this act may constitute a violation of the rule, with the degree depending on intention and circumstances. The Vibhaṅga analyzes in detail such cases as whether there was permission, whether there was a legitimate purpose, such as healing or teaching the Dharma, and whether the original purpose of the regulation was violated.
Practical Meaning
In general, this discourse is not merely an administrative rule.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.