Bu As 33. Resolution Because of Past Insanity
Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūḷhavinaya
A monk who is insane is not responsible for his own offenses. Any offenses he may have committed while insane can be cleared through a declaration of past insanity.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Amūḷhavinaya: Liberation on Account of Mental Derangement
Background
In the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, the regulations governing monastic discipline do not merely punish transgressive actions, but also take into account the mental state of the offender. The Amūḷhavinaya (amūḷha meaning "one who cannot discriminate, one whose mind is disordered") is one of the important regulations, reflecting the wisdom of the Buddhadharma in applying justice equitably to practical circumstances.
According to the Theravāda tradition, an offense (āpatti) is considered a genuine offense only when the person acts with volition (cetanā)—that is, with clear intention at the time of performing the action. If a bhikkhu is in a state of mental derangement, without full awareness or having lost the capacity for discernment, then the transgressive actions committed by him do not constitute an offense in the legal sense of the Vinaya.
Main Content
This regulation is established upon a fundamental principle: for a Vinaya offense (āpatti) to occur, three factors must simultaneously be present—namely, the event (the essential nature of the action), the act of performance, and volition (cetanā). When a bhikkhu is in a state of mental derangement and cannot maintain mental clarity, this factor of volition is not fulfilled.
The mechanism for resolving offenses through the Amūḷhavinaya is straightforward yet precise: the bhikkhu in question need only declare before witnesses (or a designated witness, if available) regarding his past state of mental derangement. This declaration is not an ordinary apology or expression of remorse, but rather a clear affirmation of his mental condition during the period in which the transgression occurred, accompanied by evidence or witnesses.
This distinguishes it from other modes of resolution, such as Tappavinaya (apology and remorse) or Anuññatti (confession). The Amūḷhavinaya rests upon a medical and psychological foundation—something the Buddhadharma recognized more than two thousand years ago.
Practical Significance
The Amūḷhavinaya teaches us that the Buddhadharma is not a rigid and impersonal legal system. Rather, it is a path of awakening built upon a profound understanding of the nature of the mind.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.