Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bi Pc 154154. Making a groundless accusation

Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūlaka

📖295 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A nun who falsely accuses another nun of an offense entailing suspension must confess the offense.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

KINH AMŪLAKA: THE SNARE OF FALSE BELIEF

Background

The Amūlaka Sutta (from amūlaka = "without root, without basis") belongs to the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha — the Vinaya code dedicated specifically to the female members of the Sangha. This is one of the important regulations in the Vinaya Piṭaka, reflecting the Buddha's profound consideration for integrity and trustworthiness within the monastic community.

The background of this text originates from a specific incident during the Buddha's time. A bhikkhunī accused another bhikkhunī of an offense involving "lying on a bed together with a man" (unchastity), a conduct regarded as a Pārājika offense — that is, a transgression leading to expulsion from the Sangha. However, this accusation was entirely without basis, with no valid evidence or witnesses to substantiate it. When the truth was brought to light, the Buddha set forth this teaching in order to protect the integrity and fairness of the Community.

Main Content

According to the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha, if a bhikkhunī voices an accusation against another bhikkhunī of committing a Pārājika offense (that is, one of the four most serious offenses in the Vinaya), but the accusation is without basis and without lawful evidence, then the one making the accusation must confess and express remorse for her wrongdoing before the Sangha.

This text emphasizes that making an "unfounded" (amūlaka) accusation is an extremely serious violation of the Vinaya. Unlike accusations that are supported by evidence, or those made with genuine motivation but ultimately unsubstantiated, a groundless accusation reflects direct dishonesty and disregard for the rules of the community.

This fine legal distinction lies in intention and evidence. If a bhikkhunī declares that she has witnessed an offense or has reliable information, but the outcome is not corroborated, that is a different matter altogether.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.