Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bi Pc 153153. Raising a hand in anger

Pāli / Sanskrit:Talasattika

📖330 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A nun who in anger physically threatens another nun must confess the offense.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Sutta 153: Raising a Hand in Anger (Talasattika)

Background

This rule appears in the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha (the Monastic Code for Nuns), in the Pācittiya section (offenses requiring confession and expiation). It reflects a real situation within the earliest community of bhikkhunīs, at a time when the Buddha Śākyamuni had just established detailed precepts for the community of women.

The Pāli title "Talasattika" means "the case of raising a horse-tail switch" — a historically attested expression for the act of immediate physical threat, even if only in its initial stage. This rule was established to restrain anger and to protect harmony (samaggī) within the community of nuns.

Main Content

According to the Pātimokkha, when a bhikkhunī, in a state of anger (kodha-rasa), raises her hand to threaten another nun — even if she does not actually strike — she has committed a Pācittiya offense. This is a fault that the offender must confess (patidesanā) before another bhikkhunī, or publicly before the assembly.

The act of "raising the hand" (tala referring to the palm or hand; sattika referring to a sevenfold gesture or the act of brandishing) represents any hostile gesture or departure from composure. Whether or not physical contact actually occurs, the intention to threaten (adhikhaṇo) is sufficient for this rule to apply.

The essential point is anger (kodha) — specifically krodha, one of the three root poisons (tikodha) in Buddhism. This differs from graver offenses (such as actually striking someone, which constitutes a Saṅghādisesa — a collective offense) because here there is no actual physical violence. Nevertheless, the intention to commit an offense has arisen, and it must be purified through public confession.

Practical Significance

This rule is not intended as punishment, but as education. Confession (patidesanā) in the Theravāda tradition is not a matter of "shame," but rather a wholesome act of recognizing one's fault and correcting anger.

It teaches that even small actions arising from anger must be attended to with care and mindfulness.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.