Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bu Pc 7575. Raising a hand in anger

Pāli / Sanskrit:Talasattika

📖334 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A monk who in anger physically threatens another monk must confess the offense.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Commentary on the Talasattika Sutta (Buddhist Pācittiya 75)

Background

The Talasattika Sutta (rendered provisionally as "Raising a Hand in Anger") appears in the Pātimokkha — the foundational code of discipline for the Monastic Order within the Theravāda tradition. In the historical organization of the Monastic Community, offenses are classified according to their degree of seriousness. A Pācittiya (confession offense) is a category of transgression requiring public confession before the Sangha; it is lighter than the more serious offenses such as Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa, yet it still calls for recognition and correction.

The precedent for this rule arose from actual circumstances within the early monastic community. The Buddha and the founding elders of the Order observed that anger, left unchecked, leads to violent action — and that even a threatening gesture alone can shatter the harmony of the Sangha and cause harm to others. This rule was therefore established to safeguard the spirit of calm and compassion within the community of practitioners.

Principal Content

According to the Talasattika, if a bhikkhu (monk), in a state of anger, raises his hand to threaten or intimidate another bhikkhu, that action is regarded as a transgression. Specifically, "raising a hand" (talassa) represents any physical action expressing an intention to harm or to induce fear, even if no actual blow is delivered. The word "anger" (kodha) is the necessary psychological factor — the action must originate from agitation and ill-will, and not from some other motive.

An important point concerns the distinction between genuine anger and actions that may be mistaken for it. If a teacher raises his hand to instruct or to protect himself, with no intention of threatening, this does not fall under this rule. However, if the action is performed with the motive of anger and for the purpose of frightening or intimidating another, such conduct must be confessed publicly (pācittiya).

Confession is not a severe punishment, but rather an acknowledgment of wrongdoing before the Sangha and a commitment to correct that behavior.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.