Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bi Np 2424. Exchanging an almsbowl with fewer than five mends

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ūnapañcabandhana

📖380 words · ~2 min read
2
Summary

A nun who asks for a new bowl when her existing bowl is still useable must relinquish it and confess the offense.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Ūnapañcabandhana: Exchanging an Almsbowl Before Five Mends Have Been Made

Background

In the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, the rules governing the use of personal requisites by bhikkhunīs are set forth in considerable detail. The rule of Ūnapañcabandhana — exchanging an almsbowl before five mends have been made — belongs to the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha, the code of training rules for bhikkhunīs, contained within the Vinaya Piṭaka.

The context from which this rule arises is the practice of managing monastic requisites. The almsbowl is the most fundamental implement of one who has gone forth from home life. It is not a luxury, but a working tool for sustaining life through alms-seeking. For this reason, the Dharma regulates strictly the replacement of personal requisites, especially the almsbowl. The rule of "five mends" (pañca bandhana) means that a bowl is considered truly beyond use only when it has already been repaired five times by a craftsman and still cannot be used. Until that threshold has been reached, a bhikkhunī is not permitted to request a new bowl.

This rule is intended to cultivate the quality of fewness of wishes (appicchatā) — in particular, contentment with little in material matters — which is one of the fundamental virtues of one who has gone forth.

Main Content

The rule of Ūnapañcabandhana is as follows: if a bhikkhunī possesses an almsbowl that is still serviceable yet wishes to request a new bowl without having waited for five mends to be made, she commits an offense — either a Sekhiya Dhamma (minor training rule offense) or, in certain circumstances, a Nissaggiya Pācittiya (an offense requiring forfeiture and confession).

Upon recognition of this transgression, the bhikkhunī must: first, relinquish the new bowl to the Saṅgha, the community of monastics as a whole; and second, openly declare the offense before the community and carry out the rite of confession (āpatti paṭidesanā). The public nature of this declaration is of essential importance — it cannot be concealed or acknowledged privately without being spoken aloud.

This rule embodies a profound principle: the personal requisites of a monastic in truth belong to the Saṅgha. The individual holds only the right to manage and use them in accordance with genuine need, and does not hold full ownership over them.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.