San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Discourse Criticizing the Distribution of Robes
(Dubbala — Vinaya Piṭaka)
Background
The Dubbala discourse belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda tradition of the Buddha-Dharma, the most detailed section of Buddhist monastic discipline. This discourse records an event that occurred within the monastic community during the Buddha’s time, concerning troubles that arose from the unfair management of requisites for practice, especially robes, which are symbols of monastic virtue and discipline.
In the early monastic communities, the distribution of robes was no small matter. The robe (kasava) was not merely clothing to protect the body, but also symbolized the renunciation of monastic faith. Abuses or favoritism in distributing such requisites could give rise to jealousy, resentment, and the breaking of harmony within the community, something about which the deepest Buddha-Dharma also gives warning.
Main Content
This discourse records the case of certain monks who were criticized by other monks because of the way they distributed or managed robes. These criticisms, though they may have arisen from a wish to protect the spirit of the community, became a motive for faultfinding, slander, and the creation of unnecessary disputes.
The Buddha perceived this breach and gave clear guidance. The content of the discourse indicates that criticizing another’s distribution of requisites, if not done in the proper way, that is, with wholesome intention, in that person’s presence, and with suitable speech, constitutes a violation of the discipline. The Buddha-Dharma does not accept unjust criticism or distorted accounts of events.
The discourse emphasizes that each monk must be responsible for the way communal property is managed. Yet supervision and criticism must be carried out within the framework of the discipline, in a spirit of compassion and mutual respect. If a monk truly discovers errors, he should report them according to the prescribed steps, rather than publicly criticizing or creating division.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.