San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Pc 35Encouraging Another Monastic to Eat More After Refusing an Invitation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dutiyapavāraṇā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
An Explanation of the Dutiyapavāraṇā Text
Encouraging Another Monastic to Eat More After Refusing an Invitation
Background
The Dutiyapavāraṇā text (the second Pavāraṇā) appears in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, reflecting rules that govern communal life among monks and nuns. In the context of the Buddha’s Dharma, eating is not a trivial matter but is directly related to the health of practice, the spirit of collectedness, and the correct performance of ritual. This text concerns situations in which a monastic, after refusing a lay devotee’s invitation to a meal, is encouraged by another member of the Sangha to eat more.
This context arises from practical need: sick or weakened monastics require care, yet the tradition of eating one meal in the morning before noon, and not eating after noon, must also be respected. The issue arises when such encouragement may lead to disputes or to violations of communal rules.
Main Content
This text in the Vinaya Piṭaka discusses the situations and rules in which one monastic encourages another monastic to continue eating after having refused an invitation. This is not a grand action, yet it carries meaning regarding concern and mutual care within the monastic community.
According to Vinaya principles, such encouragement must observe certain conditions. If a monastic truly needs nourishment or has a legitimate medical reason, such as illness or weakness, then another’s encouragement may be regarded as an act of compassion. However, if this encouragement is for another purpose or violates the principle of not eating after noon (Atimaṇḍaniyasikkhāpada), it may become a matter of Vinaya.
The Dutiyapavāraṇā text therefore establishes criteria: the motive must be genuine compassion, the recipient must be someone in need of care, and the manner must conform to communal principles. This reflects the philosophy of Theravāda Buddhism: it does not deny human material needs, but neither does it allow those needs to stray from the path of practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.